hello america! the pro-obama media doesn't have a clue as to what obama is up to, but, i have seen the writing on the wall & am here to inform you of what's up...
you've heard that old adage about keeping your enemies close---obama has taken it to heart & is keeping his within arms reach. he's very slick &, i truely feel sorry for all those that have been duped into thinking he was giving 'jobs' to his adversaries because he was 'truely reaching out'.
take a look at those that ran against him in the 2008 presidential campaign & where they are now...then you will understand me when i say that obama has stacked the democratic deck for his run in 2012.
joe biden/vice president/if obama fails-biden fails/obama has biden by the short hairs & biden will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
hilary clinton/sec of state/if obama fails-clinton fails/obama has clinton by the short hairs & will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
bill richardson/obama nominee for commerce sec/richardson withdrew from nomination due to federal investigation into 'pay-for-play' scam/richardson cannot mount a serious challenge in 2012 because of this.
john edwards/withdrew from the presidential campaign because of sexual scandal with videographer.
dennis kucinich/a strong democrat/supports obamas bills & if obama falls, he falls/does not have strong enough personality to mount a serious threat against obama.
chris dodd/extremely strong democrat/fought pres bush on all levels regarding stronger financial market regulatory reforms/is finished as a politician in his home state.
so, as you can see, obama has no strong democratic contenders for 2012. they have either done themseleves in or he's hired them without them knowing what he was planning---very, very slick &, it proves, he's not to be trusted. &, if you push the arguement to me, i can pull up the statements where biden & clinton said he was not ready to lead america.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
Saturday, May 2, 2009
LET ME OPEN YOUR EYES
hello america! let me start by 'pissing' some of you off---america got fat (under pres bush & a republican controlled washington) much to easy &, much to fast. the few safeguards that were in place to prevent the present economic problems of today---EVEN WITH PRES BUSH & HIS ADMIN CALLING FOR TIGHTER REGULATORY MEASURES---were ignored by politicians for their own political & personal gain. the dems & the repubs both continued to turn a blind eye to stronger regulation of the housing & financial markets so as, to allow those markets to continue to fill their campaign war chests. &, because our government didn't want to do their job, companies 'cooked' the books & you now know the results of that.
before i continue, i challenge you to click on the following link &, after you read it, do your homework on it. then you will know the truth for what it is & not for what obama wants you to believe it is...http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081009-10.html
the above is all part of the record that obama does not want you to see or hear. this way he can continue to feed your 'dislike' of pres bush for his own political gains by continuing to tell you how he 'inherited' this economic mess from pres bush. &, by doing so, he keeps his own 'dirty little secrets' out of the spotlight. he is so quick to blame pres bush for all of our troubles & never gives him 'good' credit for anything. under the first 6 years of pres bush, america grew at an alarming rate---that's a fact the majority of americans can attest to.
for obama to blame pres bush for our present troubles is pure crap. obama was as much a part of citigroup & the others failing as was the rest of washington...actually, he was a major player in their failing. however, our 'main-stream' media doesn't play fair & will poison us to believe what they want us to believe. in lieu of what obama has been blaming pres bush for, is it too much to ask that the other side of the coin be revealed? how come msnbc, fox, cnn & others don't ask obama about the following...click on the link below & you'll know the truth...
http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-force-it-to-make-bad-loans/
some of you call me an obama hater---call me what you will. but, let me make this perfectly clear to you. i don't get paid for these blogs. i (at this time) don't even have adds on them. i do this to put the truth out there &, i receive no form other of compensation other then the personal satisfaction of educating the ignorant. &, judging from the support america gave & is giving
obama, there are plenty of you out there that are still very ignorant about him.
but, before you condemn me all to hell, ask yourself this: why is it that certain companies get 'tarp' funds & others don't? however, before you prove your ignorance, think about this: those companies that received the most---gave the most........fannie & freddie, citigroup, gm & chrysler, bank of america &, the list goes on...check it out on opensecrets.org for yourself. &, one more thing...obama talks about the greed on wall street & the ceo's bonuses but, have you ever heard him say one sentence (with or without the teleprompter) about returning any of the money he received from those companies that received 'tarp' funds? just give some thought to obama telling you that there is too much greed at the corporate level & that those companies receiving 'tarp' funds can't pay out the bonuses & yet, he can't, hasn't, & won't tell you he is returning the money they contributed to his campaign. yet, he is spending our money to keep them afloat?
i don't care how ignorant you were prior to reading this but, if you read it all the way through & went to the links provided, i applaud you, regardless of how you now think of obama, because you now know the truth, regardless of what you do with it. &, i don't know about the truth setting you free but, i do know the truth is right.
before i continue, i challenge you to click on the following link &, after you read it, do your homework on it. then you will know the truth for what it is & not for what obama wants you to believe it is...http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081009-10.html
the above is all part of the record that obama does not want you to see or hear. this way he can continue to feed your 'dislike' of pres bush for his own political gains by continuing to tell you how he 'inherited' this economic mess from pres bush. &, by doing so, he keeps his own 'dirty little secrets' out of the spotlight. he is so quick to blame pres bush for all of our troubles & never gives him 'good' credit for anything. under the first 6 years of pres bush, america grew at an alarming rate---that's a fact the majority of americans can attest to.
for obama to blame pres bush for our present troubles is pure crap. obama was as much a part of citigroup & the others failing as was the rest of washington...actually, he was a major player in their failing. however, our 'main-stream' media doesn't play fair & will poison us to believe what they want us to believe. in lieu of what obama has been blaming pres bush for, is it too much to ask that the other side of the coin be revealed? how come msnbc, fox, cnn & others don't ask obama about the following...click on the link below & you'll know the truth...
http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-force-it-to-make-bad-loans/
some of you call me an obama hater---call me what you will. but, let me make this perfectly clear to you. i don't get paid for these blogs. i (at this time) don't even have adds on them. i do this to put the truth out there &, i receive no form other of compensation other then the personal satisfaction of educating the ignorant. &, judging from the support america gave & is giving
obama, there are plenty of you out there that are still very ignorant about him.
but, before you condemn me all to hell, ask yourself this: why is it that certain companies get 'tarp' funds & others don't? however, before you prove your ignorance, think about this: those companies that received the most---gave the most........fannie & freddie, citigroup, gm & chrysler, bank of america &, the list goes on...check it out on opensecrets.org for yourself. &, one more thing...obama talks about the greed on wall street & the ceo's bonuses but, have you ever heard him say one sentence (with or without the teleprompter) about returning any of the money he received from those companies that received 'tarp' funds? just give some thought to obama telling you that there is too much greed at the corporate level & that those companies receiving 'tarp' funds can't pay out the bonuses & yet, he can't, hasn't, & won't tell you he is returning the money they contributed to his campaign. yet, he is spending our money to keep them afloat?
i don't care how ignorant you were prior to reading this but, if you read it all the way through & went to the links provided, i applaud you, regardless of how you now think of obama, because you now know the truth, regardless of what you do with it. &, i don't know about the truth setting you free but, i do know the truth is right.
Saturday, April 25, 2009
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
hello america! just heard obamas radio address. after signing his spending bills into law, he now has the audacity to talk about fiscal responsibility.
okay obama, you want fiscal responsibility, return all the campaign money you received from those companies that you gave tarp money to. let's just start there. then you can influence the rest of washington to do the same. then, sit your black behind down & really read those bills you signed & have washington repeal every item in them that does not immediately help the economy. then, you take a good look at how much you've grown the federal government & start weaning out the excessive agencies you've created. then you look at your executive orders & repeal those that have us americans paying for overseas non essentials, like abortions &, giving money to pakistan, etc.
now, i can look at your bills & see where we can save big bucks but, you have to do it. you have to stop bailing out these failing companies & let corporate america fix their own problems. you can't continue to use our money to 'help' them when they continue to lay people off, throw them out of their homes &, won't lend them any money.
you dump all that money into an education system that needs to be repaired from the outside in. that is; the surrounding school areas need to be cleansed of the drugs, gangs &, violence as do the schools themselves. no amount of money you pay the teachers &, no matter how modern you make the school building, you'll never address the real problems. as a former community organizer, you should have known this better then most. we already have armed police within the schools, cameras & metal detectors & the problems still exist. &, as you very well know, most of the students & teachers won't speak out because you can't protect them. you can dump a trillion dollars in cabrini green & all you'll have done is paint rotted wood.
obama, you have the american people behind you (well, quite a few of us are not), & you have a great opportunity to do what's good for this country but, you have to lead by example. &, your starting with spending a lot & now wanting to cut back is not a good example. before you go any further, clean up the mess you have made & then go forward.
another thing, obama. you didn't inherit this economic mess, you were a part of it back in 1993 (remember) & you've been a big part of it since you were first elected to washington &, you did nothing to stem the tide then & you were in the majority.
okay obama, you want fiscal responsibility, return all the campaign money you received from those companies that you gave tarp money to. let's just start there. then you can influence the rest of washington to do the same. then, sit your black behind down & really read those bills you signed & have washington repeal every item in them that does not immediately help the economy. then, you take a good look at how much you've grown the federal government & start weaning out the excessive agencies you've created. then you look at your executive orders & repeal those that have us americans paying for overseas non essentials, like abortions &, giving money to pakistan, etc.
now, i can look at your bills & see where we can save big bucks but, you have to do it. you have to stop bailing out these failing companies & let corporate america fix their own problems. you can't continue to use our money to 'help' them when they continue to lay people off, throw them out of their homes &, won't lend them any money.
you dump all that money into an education system that needs to be repaired from the outside in. that is; the surrounding school areas need to be cleansed of the drugs, gangs &, violence as do the schools themselves. no amount of money you pay the teachers &, no matter how modern you make the school building, you'll never address the real problems. as a former community organizer, you should have known this better then most. we already have armed police within the schools, cameras & metal detectors & the problems still exist. &, as you very well know, most of the students & teachers won't speak out because you can't protect them. you can dump a trillion dollars in cabrini green & all you'll have done is paint rotted wood.
obama, you have the american people behind you (well, quite a few of us are not), & you have a great opportunity to do what's good for this country but, you have to lead by example. &, your starting with spending a lot & now wanting to cut back is not a good example. before you go any further, clean up the mess you have made & then go forward.
another thing, obama. you didn't inherit this economic mess, you were a part of it back in 1993 (remember) & you've been a big part of it since you were first elected to washington &, you did nothing to stem the tide then & you were in the majority.
CONGRATS TO FORD
hello america! it is with great pride that i pen the following::::FORD MOTOR COMPANY seems to be doing okay.
if you remember, they were part of the 'big three' that had requested bailout money but, didn't take a cent. &, this leads me to wonder what in the hell is my government doing?
ford didn't get any federal money, nor did they file for bankruptcy & seem to be headed in a positive direction.
meanwhile, gm & chrysler did receive federal money & seem extremely close to 'failure'.
there is something very wrong with this picture.
so, i say this to obama, keep your dirty little hands out of corporate america. everything you have touched is failing. &, while i'm at it, return the campaign money you got from the 'tarp' recipients.
if you remember, they were part of the 'big three' that had requested bailout money but, didn't take a cent. &, this leads me to wonder what in the hell is my government doing?
ford didn't get any federal money, nor did they file for bankruptcy & seem to be headed in a positive direction.
meanwhile, gm & chrysler did receive federal money & seem extremely close to 'failure'.
there is something very wrong with this picture.
so, i say this to obama, keep your dirty little hands out of corporate america. everything you have touched is failing. &, while i'm at it, return the campaign money you got from the 'tarp' recipients.
RELEASE IT ALL
hello america! obamas plan is working---here i am (again), talking about 'torture' & not the economy.
obama has the 'power' to put this whole thing to bed. he's already released 4 memos---don't tease us---release them all. he didn't care about national security then-don't let him care now. let him release all of the memos. let america decide for themselves..just publish the facts per obamas 'transparency' crap without any spin to it, & we, as a people, can figure it out. put it on the web.
FOR THE RECORD, I DO NOT CONDONE WHOLESALE TORTURE BUT, if torture will save american lives, i'm all for it. we get so caught up in the right & wrongs of war but, those we are at war with don't play by our rules.
how can you apply our rules & laws to those that send women & children into markets to detonate bombs? how can you want to investigate those that use devious methods to stop them?
america, let's get this right. if some group were to snatch my sons or grandsons, i wouldn't care what methods were used on the offenders to bring my loved ones to safety. would you?
so america, contact obama & tell him to release all the documents & memos on torture, to include what info was gleamed from the tortures-------let us decide for ourselves. i know now that if the minutues from the 2002 meeting that pelosi was in, she would be ready to throw the towel in.
obama has the 'power' to put this whole thing to bed. he's already released 4 memos---don't tease us---release them all. he didn't care about national security then-don't let him care now. let him release all of the memos. let america decide for themselves..just publish the facts per obamas 'transparency' crap without any spin to it, & we, as a people, can figure it out. put it on the web.
FOR THE RECORD, I DO NOT CONDONE WHOLESALE TORTURE BUT, if torture will save american lives, i'm all for it. we get so caught up in the right & wrongs of war but, those we are at war with don't play by our rules.
how can you apply our rules & laws to those that send women & children into markets to detonate bombs? how can you want to investigate those that use devious methods to stop them?
america, let's get this right. if some group were to snatch my sons or grandsons, i wouldn't care what methods were used on the offenders to bring my loved ones to safety. would you?
so america, contact obama & tell him to release all the documents & memos on torture, to include what info was gleamed from the tortures-------let us decide for ourselves. i know now that if the minutues from the 2002 meeting that pelosi was in, she would be ready to throw the towel in.
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
HE'S SLICK IN A BAD WAY
hello america! obama is very slick &, i don't mean in a good way. he's now saying 'let's move forward' after opening the door about the torture tactics used at gitmo. he got the ball rolling by releasing the memos & now wants to sit on the side lines as a good guy that doesn't want to get caught up in the politics of an investigation. & yet, he & biden said during their campaign speeches that they were going to go after pres george bush...you can 'google' it or go here...
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/03/uselections2008.joebiden
so now, the media is all over the upcoming investigation by ag william holder, &, it should never have gotten this far. common sense says that if the tactics used saved just one american life &/or the lives of our allies, then it was worth it. drop all this public window-dressing, rewrite the torture policy behind very closed doors &, move on.
if obama was as honest as he would like to dupe you into thinking, he would order his ag to investigate why the government dropped the ball on our economy. but, this won't happen because it would cost the democrats their seats---they allowed this to happen on their watch of which obama was a part of---don't swallow that 'we inherited this mess' crap. how can you inherited something you've been a part of for the last 2 plus years?
this going after pres bush & his administration is pure democrat smoke-screen...it takes the obama spending off the front page; it covers the failed bailout attempts; &, more importantly, it hides what a democrat controled house & senate failed to do for this country since 2006. but, don't get me wrong...there are plenty of republicans that need to be nailed to the wall also.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2008/sep/03/uselections2008.joebiden
so now, the media is all over the upcoming investigation by ag william holder, &, it should never have gotten this far. common sense says that if the tactics used saved just one american life &/or the lives of our allies, then it was worth it. drop all this public window-dressing, rewrite the torture policy behind very closed doors &, move on.
if obama was as honest as he would like to dupe you into thinking, he would order his ag to investigate why the government dropped the ball on our economy. but, this won't happen because it would cost the democrats their seats---they allowed this to happen on their watch of which obama was a part of---don't swallow that 'we inherited this mess' crap. how can you inherited something you've been a part of for the last 2 plus years?
this going after pres bush & his administration is pure democrat smoke-screen...it takes the obama spending off the front page; it covers the failed bailout attempts; &, more importantly, it hides what a democrat controled house & senate failed to do for this country since 2006. but, don't get me wrong...there are plenty of republicans that need to be nailed to the wall also.
Saturday, April 18, 2009
WE DON'T NEED UNIONS
hello america! let's start with the 'TRUTH'. unions are only good for those companies & markets that can support them. that being said, i just need you to name successful unionized companies. okay, that's a hard one to answer so, i'll ask you an easy one...can you name a unionized company that's either failing or has failed? it's amazing how many roll off your tongue.
well, with obama & the democrats pushing for unionized labor, you'll have quite a few more companies to name. they are trying to make it so easy for unions to form within any & all businesses with just a simple, public 'yes or no' vote---no more debates/no more meetings. &, intentional or not, their plans will wreck this country faster then anything else &, the union leaders will help anyway they can because it means more money & power for them---the hell with the country.
unions cause companies to raise prices, which are passed on to us-the consumer. they also cause companies to fold up or relocate overseas. this is how it works:::::::::
1...certain companies are targeted by the union leaders;
2...debates & meetings (as it is now) determine which way the company goes based on secret ballot;
3...once the company is unionized, the members pay dues to the union for various services, ie; collective bargaining (which is a fancy way of saying higher wages), a voice in washington, etc.
4...companies are forced to raise their prices to afford paying the union members, thus, charging you more for their goods & services...which in turn put the union member & company in a higher tax bracket.
let me break it down like this...if you take target, walmart, jc penny, sears, & costco & unionize them, i don't think you'd be shopping them as much as you now do. they would be forced to raise their prices & pass them on to the consumer. can you imagine what a pizza would cost if dominoes became unionized? or, if all the truckers became unionized? how about the taxi companies? wherever there's a union, prices are higher......please prove me wrong, please.
come on america, tell me we would be better of with mcdonalds & burger king unionized..bet you wouldn't find a dollar menu anymore. let long john silver go union & i'll bet you won't be eating there much, if at all. can you imagine going to wendy's or kfc if they join the union?
some of the above named companies would be forced to fold up or move overseas---they simply could not stay in business, &, moreso for those companies that depend on repeat customers. maybe you would be willing to sponsor beauticians & barbers unionizing.
you see what unions have done to the caterpillar plant obama visited. you see what they have done to the auto industry. &, you see what they are doing to all of professional sports. we have lost so much here because of unions. bethlehem steel, mac trucks just to name 2 of them. yes, corporate greed has played a big role.
yes, people need to earn more then what they are getting but, unionizing them is not the way. if we are to think that obama & the democrats are serious about upgrading the pay scale, why did they give us such a low minimum wage? they vote themselves 'cost-of-living' allowances & raises almost yearly & yet, have done so little for the minimum wage earner. &, their plans for unions don't help them. you look at our national minimum wage---you have to admit it's a joke.
unionizing the above named companies will flood the unemployment rolls because most of the companies can't or won't stay here.
america, you don't have to believe what i'm telling you---just do this to find out how wrong i am....the next time you have a plumbing or electrical problem in your home or business, call a licensed, unionized company to come out & fix it. before you hire them, call a licensed, non-unionized company to come out & fix it. compare the estimates---i'm willing to bet that the work will be the same but, the costs to you will be very different.
well, with obama & the democrats pushing for unionized labor, you'll have quite a few more companies to name. they are trying to make it so easy for unions to form within any & all businesses with just a simple, public 'yes or no' vote---no more debates/no more meetings. &, intentional or not, their plans will wreck this country faster then anything else &, the union leaders will help anyway they can because it means more money & power for them---the hell with the country.
unions cause companies to raise prices, which are passed on to us-the consumer. they also cause companies to fold up or relocate overseas. this is how it works:::::::::
1...certain companies are targeted by the union leaders;
2...debates & meetings (as it is now) determine which way the company goes based on secret ballot;
3...once the company is unionized, the members pay dues to the union for various services, ie; collective bargaining (which is a fancy way of saying higher wages), a voice in washington, etc.
4...companies are forced to raise their prices to afford paying the union members, thus, charging you more for their goods & services...which in turn put the union member & company in a higher tax bracket.
let me break it down like this...if you take target, walmart, jc penny, sears, & costco & unionize them, i don't think you'd be shopping them as much as you now do. they would be forced to raise their prices & pass them on to the consumer. can you imagine what a pizza would cost if dominoes became unionized? or, if all the truckers became unionized? how about the taxi companies? wherever there's a union, prices are higher......please prove me wrong, please.
come on america, tell me we would be better of with mcdonalds & burger king unionized..bet you wouldn't find a dollar menu anymore. let long john silver go union & i'll bet you won't be eating there much, if at all. can you imagine going to wendy's or kfc if they join the union?
some of the above named companies would be forced to fold up or move overseas---they simply could not stay in business, &, moreso for those companies that depend on repeat customers. maybe you would be willing to sponsor beauticians & barbers unionizing.
you see what unions have done to the caterpillar plant obama visited. you see what they have done to the auto industry. &, you see what they are doing to all of professional sports. we have lost so much here because of unions. bethlehem steel, mac trucks just to name 2 of them. yes, corporate greed has played a big role.
yes, people need to earn more then what they are getting but, unionizing them is not the way. if we are to think that obama & the democrats are serious about upgrading the pay scale, why did they give us such a low minimum wage? they vote themselves 'cost-of-living' allowances & raises almost yearly & yet, have done so little for the minimum wage earner. &, their plans for unions don't help them. you look at our national minimum wage---you have to admit it's a joke.
unionizing the above named companies will flood the unemployment rolls because most of the companies can't or won't stay here.
america, you don't have to believe what i'm telling you---just do this to find out how wrong i am....the next time you have a plumbing or electrical problem in your home or business, call a licensed, unionized company to come out & fix it. before you hire them, call a licensed, non-unionized company to come out & fix it. compare the estimates---i'm willing to bet that the work will be the same but, the costs to you will be very different.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)