hello america!!! if it's not for his own interests, obama says the hell with you & makes excuses. just further proof of what kind of character obama has...perhaps this video will refresh your fond memories of him making a promise he just refused to keep...http://obamalies.net/ he did not march with the unions when they were demonstrating in wisconsin & that was by choice.
the dems & the unions have to feel let down by obama because had he of showed up on their 'picket lines', undoubtedly, he would have had them all rushing to vote for tom barrett & it would have been a dem landslide.
unfortunately for his wisconsin supporters, running the country is a very demanding job & it keeps obama very busy. however, obama hasn't been 'running' (from day 1), he is in full campaign mode & he's willing to sacrifice a governor or two in persuit of that almighty campaign donation...so, who can blame when he says he was too busy...see & hear it for yourself here & i apologize for the 15 second ad......
http://www.wbay.com/story/18760136/2012/06/11/one-on-one-president-obama-on-wisconsin-politics
& see here & see just why he was 'too busy'
http://bloggingblue.com/2012/06/14/president-obama-needs-to-come-up-with-a-better-excuse-for-avoiding-wisconsin/
just so you know:::wisconsin is not the only place obama let the dems down in a big election---how could you forget the special election in 2010 for the senate seat of sen ed kennedy & i wrote it about it then---see here---
http://edagener.blogspot.com/2010/01/thank-you-massachusetts.html
& this is the ny times on the election....
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/20/us/politics/20election.html?_r=1
i just could not resist putting this in here---
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/24/new-hampshire-town-asks-obama-campaign-to-pay-for-costs-upcoming-visit/
this is an obama reminder......http://www.redstate.com/reincepriebus/2012/06/08/doing-fine/
Sunday, June 24, 2012
OBAMA, READ THIS!!!
hello america!!! here's your daily jobs situation & i wish for evertbody's sake, it would remain this inactive..
http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/
while i hear onama blasting gov mitt romney for sending jobs overseas, how comes he doesn't mention CATERPILLAR, oh, that's that company he 'bailed' out & said it was a model for our future...well, please read about our 'model for the future' &, please look at the 3rd & 11th paragraph.....see here....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/28/job-market-booming-overseas_n_801839.html at the bottom of the article, you can read about coca-cola. i guess coca-cola going overseas is okay because obama doesn't even mention it...need i remind obama about ge ceo jeffrey immelt & their moving jobs overseas?
we have lost a lot of company's under obama because of the uncertainty about taxes & regulations. plus they can see he is not serious about shrinking gov't, shrinking the national debt or, making it easier for company's to hire new workers.
i wrote about the following article sep 1, 2011 "obama, you're a failure"
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/morning_call/2011/09/coke-ceo-taxes-make-us-less.html
if you have a 401k plan, some of that money may be going to fund a venture capital company & 'good ole boy' obama can't mention that. if you start or run a business, the main object is to make a profit &, if you can't do it in one place, you might have to move to a 'job friendly' state to do it. taxes, regs, unions have a lot to do with company's going overseas. a lot of company's like bain capital, invest money in failing company's & try to bring them to profitability & yes, that may mean moving the company overseas. it's sad but it part of finances 101. while i wish that we could retain all jobs here, i would rather lose them to workers overseas then just lose them because some clown doesn't know anything about running a business, much less our country. in the grand scheme of things, at least somebody's working.---obama, read this---
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/10-states-losing-the-most-jobs-china-247-wall-st_n_975990.html
http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/
while i hear onama blasting gov mitt romney for sending jobs overseas, how comes he doesn't mention CATERPILLAR, oh, that's that company he 'bailed' out & said it was a model for our future...well, please read about our 'model for the future' &, please look at the 3rd & 11th paragraph.....see here....
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/12/28/job-market-booming-overseas_n_801839.html at the bottom of the article, you can read about coca-cola. i guess coca-cola going overseas is okay because obama doesn't even mention it...need i remind obama about ge ceo jeffrey immelt & their moving jobs overseas?
we have lost a lot of company's under obama because of the uncertainty about taxes & regulations. plus they can see he is not serious about shrinking gov't, shrinking the national debt or, making it easier for company's to hire new workers.
i wrote about the following article sep 1, 2011 "obama, you're a failure"
http://www.bizjournals.com/phoenix/morning_call/2011/09/coke-ceo-taxes-make-us-less.html
if you have a 401k plan, some of that money may be going to fund a venture capital company & 'good ole boy' obama can't mention that. if you start or run a business, the main object is to make a profit &, if you can't do it in one place, you might have to move to a 'job friendly' state to do it. taxes, regs, unions have a lot to do with company's going overseas. a lot of company's like bain capital, invest money in failing company's & try to bring them to profitability & yes, that may mean moving the company overseas. it's sad but it part of finances 101. while i wish that we could retain all jobs here, i would rather lose them to workers overseas then just lose them because some clown doesn't know anything about running a business, much less our country. in the grand scheme of things, at least somebody's working.---obama, read this---
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/09/22/10-states-losing-the-most-jobs-china-247-wall-st_n_975990.html
OBAMA, YOUR OATH ON THE BIBLE---OH, THAT'S RIGHT, YOU LOST YOUR FAITH EVOLVING!!!
hello america!!! wait a minute---hold the presses---i just thought of something. obama granted temporary amnesty to about 800,000 illegal aliens if they came here as children, don't have criminal record, have graduated from an american high school &, can prove they've lived in the country for 5 consecutive years &, if i heard it right, it from the age of 30 on down. okay, problem--no, several problems::::how are they going to 'prove' they've been here for 5 years when obama says they don't have to have valid id cards to vote or register to vote; how are these undocumented kids being allowed to get into the school systems if they were deemed illegals before obamas amnesty; what happens to the parents of these 'people' if they are here illegally? does obama break another law & allow them to stay or, do we deport them breaking up the family?
here, read it for yourself........
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/watch-live-obama-explains-decision-legalize-young-illegal-165949610.html
my next question goes like this: obama is singling out the latino vote & making the same promises he made the first time...will he go to china town in ny & make the same speech? after all, there are plenty of illegal asians here. then you have the haitians, africans, europeans &, whoever. why is obama only targeting one ethnic group?
obamas move was political in every way possible &, he stole the thunder from sen marco rubio who is trying to reach across the isle to get our immigration problems solved the right way. that said, i cannot see why obama can't be sued & forced to explain why he chose to ignore the immigration laws that are on the books.
obama took an oath to uphold our laws & our constitution &, from where i sit, he broke both of them....
here, read it for yourself........
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/watch-live-obama-explains-decision-legalize-young-illegal-165949610.html
my next question goes like this: obama is singling out the latino vote & making the same promises he made the first time...will he go to china town in ny & make the same speech? after all, there are plenty of illegal asians here. then you have the haitians, africans, europeans &, whoever. why is obama only targeting one ethnic group?
obamas move was political in every way possible &, he stole the thunder from sen marco rubio who is trying to reach across the isle to get our immigration problems solved the right way. that said, i cannot see why obama can't be sued & forced to explain why he chose to ignore the immigration laws that are on the books.
obama took an oath to uphold our laws & our constitution &, from where i sit, he broke both of them....
OBAMA, WOULD YOU BE THE RAT???
hello america!!! i was recently asked why i copy & paste so many articles from foxnews &, although i don't have to answer that, i'm going to:::the answer is, a lot of the other 'pro-obama-biased' media outlets don't report the negativity's concerning obama & his cabinet & foxnews does. true fact. for that matter, so many people i talk to in the streets thought 'fast & furious' was about the movie...where as, foxnews has been covering it from day one..........that said, there's this:::::::::::::
the house investigation started by ATF agents going through their own chain-of-command about guns being allowed to walk without being tracked &, the death of border agent, brian terry (2 of the walked guns were found at the scene of his death). neither the ATF or the DOJ responded to the agents & they contacted sen grassley. from the beginning, the ATF nor the DOJ knew anything which was later proven to be a lie. ag, william holder, testified under oath that he learn of the program a few weeks before he had to testify; this also was a lie & it was found out holder knew of the program a lot sooner. holder has also been very evasive & has withheld documents that the committee requested. a letter was written denying the program & about 10/11 months later was retracted. holder agreed to a meeting with select members of the committee in an attempt to avoid the contempt of congress charges but showed up at the meetings without the documents. holder had previously stated under oath that he would not be seeking 'executive privilege'---another lie because he wrote a letter to obama the morning of the committee vote on contempt. prior to all of this, holder had said he would make the documents available. holder got the privilege & the committee voted (along party lines) & sent the matter to the full house for contempt against holder...obama did an interview with univision & told them that neither he nor holder gave the okay for the program....there are approx 80,000 documents (according to holder) on the program but only 7,600 have been submitted..........there you have, 18 months of investigations &: 1. we have no answer on who okayed the program; 2. we don't know why the program was started; 3. we don't know where the guns are; 4. we don't know how high up this goes; 5. we don't know who to hold responsible for the death of brian terry; 6. we have no answers for the family of brian terry; 7. there are reports that punitive actions have been taken against the whistle blowers...it's actually harder to stop something from reoccurring if you don't know how it got started. see here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/05/issa-wiretaps-show-immense-detail-about-questionable-fast-furious-tactics/?intcmp=obinsite
please read the 15th paragraph down in this story......
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/23/court-rulings-suggest-privilege-claim-over-furious-docs-would-fizzle/
as i have written before, the dems called the investigations a 'witch hunt'. to that i say, when you hunt for witches, you just might find one---however, they should call it a 'rat hunt' because there's a big rat in here somewhere....
the house investigation started by ATF agents going through their own chain-of-command about guns being allowed to walk without being tracked &, the death of border agent, brian terry (2 of the walked guns were found at the scene of his death). neither the ATF or the DOJ responded to the agents & they contacted sen grassley. from the beginning, the ATF nor the DOJ knew anything which was later proven to be a lie. ag, william holder, testified under oath that he learn of the program a few weeks before he had to testify; this also was a lie & it was found out holder knew of the program a lot sooner. holder has also been very evasive & has withheld documents that the committee requested. a letter was written denying the program & about 10/11 months later was retracted. holder agreed to a meeting with select members of the committee in an attempt to avoid the contempt of congress charges but showed up at the meetings without the documents. holder had previously stated under oath that he would not be seeking 'executive privilege'---another lie because he wrote a letter to obama the morning of the committee vote on contempt. prior to all of this, holder had said he would make the documents available. holder got the privilege & the committee voted (along party lines) & sent the matter to the full house for contempt against holder...obama did an interview with univision & told them that neither he nor holder gave the okay for the program....there are approx 80,000 documents (according to holder) on the program but only 7,600 have been submitted..........there you have, 18 months of investigations &: 1. we have no answer on who okayed the program; 2. we don't know why the program was started; 3. we don't know where the guns are; 4. we don't know how high up this goes; 5. we don't know who to hold responsible for the death of brian terry; 6. we have no answers for the family of brian terry; 7. there are reports that punitive actions have been taken against the whistle blowers...it's actually harder to stop something from reoccurring if you don't know how it got started. see here...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ATF_gunwalking_scandal
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/05/issa-wiretaps-show-immense-detail-about-questionable-fast-furious-tactics/?intcmp=obinsite
please read the 15th paragraph down in this story......
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/06/23/court-rulings-suggest-privilege-claim-over-furious-docs-would-fizzle/
as i have written before, the dems called the investigations a 'witch hunt'. to that i say, when you hunt for witches, you just might find one---however, they should call it a 'rat hunt' because there's a big rat in here somewhere....
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)