hello america!!! http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/02/16/illegal-immigrant-takes-refuge-in-denver-church-to-avoid-deportation.html
look, think whatever you wish to, however, this lady was issued court deportation orders in 2011 & her stay here was 'extended' by the obama admin---she had been declared an 'enforcement priority' & had 2 misdemeanor convictions &, she's still refusing to being deported after missing a scheduled 'check-in' with ice officials...
yes, one could argue that her crimes weren't that serious but, nobody 'forced' her to drive a car or to 'make' fraudulent documents & hey, you wouldn't even be arguing for her if she had of run into your car & injured one of your loved ones or, are you one of those idiots that say, leave her alone until she does???
Monday, February 20, 2017
NATO PAYS WHAT???
hello america!!! i've got many questions for the democrats, the media &, the 'anti-trump people'---so, i ask---
what's wrong with trump getting the nato country's to pay their 'fair share'---seems to me that, if they do pay their 'fair share' we would be paying less & have more money to take care of some of the things we need to address within our own borders---currently, there are 28 country's that hold 'nato membership' & of them, only 5 are meeting the '2% of gdp commitment---meaning, 23 country's are not paying their 'fair share'---i know that some of you that oppose anything trump wants to accomplish will have a problem with this but, if 6 of us buy a house with the understanding that we equally split the costs, what happens when 3 of us decide not to???
A---if the other 3 want to keep the house, they'll have to pay more while the other 3 still enjoy the benefits of living there while paying less
B---you 'force' them to pay their 'fair share'
C---you 'evict' them from the contract & force them to live elsewhere on their own
D---you free yourselves from the contract & leave the house
now, if only i could remember what trump's choices were/HMMM???
here's the nato breakdown---http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/04/15/nato-3_custom1.jpg?iid=EL
what's wrong with trump getting the nato country's to pay their 'fair share'---seems to me that, if they do pay their 'fair share' we would be paying less & have more money to take care of some of the things we need to address within our own borders---currently, there are 28 country's that hold 'nato membership' & of them, only 5 are meeting the '2% of gdp commitment---meaning, 23 country's are not paying their 'fair share'---i know that some of you that oppose anything trump wants to accomplish will have a problem with this but, if 6 of us buy a house with the understanding that we equally split the costs, what happens when 3 of us decide not to???
A---if the other 3 want to keep the house, they'll have to pay more while the other 3 still enjoy the benefits of living there while paying less
B---you 'force' them to pay their 'fair share'
C---you 'evict' them from the contract & force them to live elsewhere on their own
D---you free yourselves from the contract & leave the house
now, if only i could remember what trump's choices were/HMMM???
here's the nato breakdown---http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2016/images/04/15/nato-3_custom1.jpg?iid=EL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)