hello america! have any of you had time to check out the debate on c-span? it's the us house of representatives , both repubs & dems debating the remaining 350 billion dollar bailout money. if you really listen to it, the dems just want to give the monery out & the repubs are against that.
the main man for the dems is rep barney franks. yep, gud ole barney. he has screwed us so many times in the past by fighting against regulation for the financial markets. we would not be in this financial mess if it weren't for barney franks, chris dodd, harry ried & others. & YES, REPUBLICANS SHARE IN THE BLAME.
i am not here to assign blame for the financial & housing markets collaspe but, certain names pop out at me whenever i research who did what & when.
rep jeb hensarling, r-texas, was very impressive when debating against franks & i hope the rest of the repubs saw it his way. for that matter, i hope the dems see it that way but, that's wishfull thinking.
although this bill may make it through the house, i strongly expect it to have a lot of problems making it through the senate. time will tell.
america, enough is enough & all this bailout crap is enough. how can barney franks get on live, public tv & blame bush for anything
do your research america! barney franks is not for america & should have been kicked out of office years ago. put another dem in his seat but, please remove him. just google barney franks & see for yourself. apparently, the good people of the state of mass don't know how to do this nor do they know the harm that barney franks & his cohorts are directly responsible for.
do your own research america.
Thursday, January 15, 2009
TRANSPARENCY---NOT THIS ADMINISTRATION
hello america! transparency? yeah, right. the obama camp is again hiding things from us that should prove to you obamaholics, his administration will be business as usual.
rahm emanual should have been a big clue as to what obama sees as what should be transparent. he will only comment on negativities when they become public---you saw this throughout his campaigning & ignored it. why should he change now?
the man that obama named to head the treasury, timothy geithner, has had his own problems with taxes to the tune of $34, 000. yeah, he should be another good fit for obama.
it seems that obama & his camp knew of his problems & asked certain senators to keep it quiet. i will be posting more on this as it becomes available.
in the mean time, don't take my word on it, google timothy geithner & see for yourselves. there's quite a lot out there.
rahm emanual should have been a big clue as to what obama sees as what should be transparent. he will only comment on negativities when they become public---you saw this throughout his campaigning & ignored it. why should he change now?
the man that obama named to head the treasury, timothy geithner, has had his own problems with taxes to the tune of $34, 000. yeah, he should be another good fit for obama.
it seems that obama & his camp knew of his problems & asked certain senators to keep it quiet. i will be posting more on this as it becomes available.
in the mean time, don't take my word on it, google timothy geithner & see for yourselves. there's quite a lot out there.
CLOSING GITMO-A BIG MISTAKE
hello america! perhaps you can answer this question for me---if a member of your family was kidnapped, would you really care what the police had to do to return that member to you safely? i mean, wouldn't you want them to do everything in their power to accomplish that?
or, would you be one of those that demand that the police respect the rights of the perpertrators to the point of you never getting your family member back safely?
well, obama seems to think that his closing gitmo (guantanamo) & issuing those captured in battle against us civil rights, goes against every grain of my moral being. i have a big problem with this.
you cannot capture the enemy during the battle & then give them the same rights americans experience during incarceration. nor can you release them freely. if this is allowed to occur, we will have intentionally sealed an effective way of gathering information that could result is less american lives being lost.
in the two wars we are currently involved in, our enemy is ruthless. they show us no mercy, in fact, they go the opposite route. to most of us, they almost appear subhuman in their ability to inflict death & destruction on our military & civilian forces. they seem to think that strapping a bomb on a young woman & sending her into a marketplace to blow up is a thing of honor. they don't care who dies or is injured &, they have no morals about waging their war from their places of worship.
even with all the 'bad news' coming from gitmo, these people are being treated better then they were in their own country. their religion is being respected, they're clothed, they eat (based on their religion), they sleep, & they exercise. &, if water-boarding is what it takes to save american lives, so be it.
not wishing this on anybody but, when the enemy captures your son or daughter or freind, please make your voice is heard about giving the enemy rights. if my daughter-in-law were captured by the enemy, i wouldn't care what means were used to secure her rescue.
as usual, obama has it wrong!
or, would you be one of those that demand that the police respect the rights of the perpertrators to the point of you never getting your family member back safely?
well, obama seems to think that his closing gitmo (guantanamo) & issuing those captured in battle against us civil rights, goes against every grain of my moral being. i have a big problem with this.
you cannot capture the enemy during the battle & then give them the same rights americans experience during incarceration. nor can you release them freely. if this is allowed to occur, we will have intentionally sealed an effective way of gathering information that could result is less american lives being lost.
in the two wars we are currently involved in, our enemy is ruthless. they show us no mercy, in fact, they go the opposite route. to most of us, they almost appear subhuman in their ability to inflict death & destruction on our military & civilian forces. they seem to think that strapping a bomb on a young woman & sending her into a marketplace to blow up is a thing of honor. they don't care who dies or is injured &, they have no morals about waging their war from their places of worship.
even with all the 'bad news' coming from gitmo, these people are being treated better then they were in their own country. their religion is being respected, they're clothed, they eat (based on their religion), they sleep, & they exercise. &, if water-boarding is what it takes to save american lives, so be it.
not wishing this on anybody but, when the enemy captures your son or daughter or freind, please make your voice is heard about giving the enemy rights. if my daughter-in-law were captured by the enemy, i wouldn't care what means were used to secure her rescue.
as usual, obama has it wrong!
DON'T ASK-DON'T TELL
hello america! since the inception of the "DON'T ASK-DON'T TELL" policy, we've heard extremely little negative reports about it. so, it must be working! why then will obama get rid of it? what does he have against 'gays' in the military (in which he never served )?
the numbers of 'gays' in the military are not known, & yet, i would be willing to wager that there are quite a few of them in there. obama wants to change that for whatever reason. again, i must ask why? if they are not creating a problem with those they serve with, leave them the hell alone. why force them to expose themselves & then suffer further humiliation by forcing them out of the military &/or being denied entrance?
if the 'gays' in the military can follow orders, accomplish the mission, & keep their sexual preferences to themselves, what harm do they pose? actually, if they can perform their duties in an honorable manner, they are serving this country in ways that obama knows nothing of first hand.
if this is why the obamaholics elected obama then they have succeeded. congratulations! however, i'll bet that the 'gay community' would like to recast their vote.
well, looking at things the way they are, if obama can force the 'gays' out of the military, it will only be a matter of time before he forces the women out. after all, obama will be the commander-in-chief of the united states armed forces. yes, his lack of inexperience is about to pay off in a negative way.
with all that is going on in these dire times, isn't it wonderful to know obama has the time to worry about 'gays' in the military?
besides, rep. barney franks is an admitted 'gay'---shouldn't he be forbidden involvement in anything related to the military? if a 'gay' can't serve their country in the military, they should not be allowed to serve in the house or the senate. where will it stop obama? where?
the numbers of 'gays' in the military are not known, & yet, i would be willing to wager that there are quite a few of them in there. obama wants to change that for whatever reason. again, i must ask why? if they are not creating a problem with those they serve with, leave them the hell alone. why force them to expose themselves & then suffer further humiliation by forcing them out of the military &/or being denied entrance?
if the 'gays' in the military can follow orders, accomplish the mission, & keep their sexual preferences to themselves, what harm do they pose? actually, if they can perform their duties in an honorable manner, they are serving this country in ways that obama knows nothing of first hand.
if this is why the obamaholics elected obama then they have succeeded. congratulations! however, i'll bet that the 'gay community' would like to recast their vote.
well, looking at things the way they are, if obama can force the 'gays' out of the military, it will only be a matter of time before he forces the women out. after all, obama will be the commander-in-chief of the united states armed forces. yes, his lack of inexperience is about to pay off in a negative way.
with all that is going on in these dire times, isn't it wonderful to know obama has the time to worry about 'gays' in the military?
besides, rep. barney franks is an admitted 'gay'---shouldn't he be forbidden involvement in anything related to the military? if a 'gay' can't serve their country in the military, they should not be allowed to serve in the house or the senate. where will it stop obama? where?
HEATH CARE
hello america! for a 'man for the people', obama is really showing he's anything but. on the other hand, i for one, never will expect him to be that---he has very little record of helping the people.
his plans to 'force' 2.5 million children to get enrolled in his health care plan (even though they have their own insurance providers) strengthens the arguement about universal health care. if obama is allowed to pull this off, it will just be a matter of time before he 'forces' you, as an adult, to become enrolled in his health care package for adults. besides, this may come as good news to all those obamaholics that they will eventually have to pay for this out of their own pockets.
obama must not have studied all those other countries with their universal health care systems. they didn't work there & they ain't gonna work here. there's way to much corruption between the federal government & the health care industry for this to be anything but a failure. &, as a 'man for the people' obama knows this & he also knows you are going to be stuck in the middle of this failure. you're going to end up not having any health care at all.
you want to fix health care? put stronger, enforcable laws on the books that are designed to root out the collaboration & coruption between the government & the health care industry &, jail those that influence the cost of business & medicine. &, if a foreign market creates a drug that works, is safe, & affordable, allow us to purchase it without any crap.
all the above being said, i realize there are those that have no health care at all &, they are the ones that should be enrolled in health care systems that are designed to fit their health care needs.
his plans to 'force' 2.5 million children to get enrolled in his health care plan (even though they have their own insurance providers) strengthens the arguement about universal health care. if obama is allowed to pull this off, it will just be a matter of time before he 'forces' you, as an adult, to become enrolled in his health care package for adults. besides, this may come as good news to all those obamaholics that they will eventually have to pay for this out of their own pockets.
obama must not have studied all those other countries with their universal health care systems. they didn't work there & they ain't gonna work here. there's way to much corruption between the federal government & the health care industry for this to be anything but a failure. &, as a 'man for the people' obama knows this & he also knows you are going to be stuck in the middle of this failure. you're going to end up not having any health care at all.
you want to fix health care? put stronger, enforcable laws on the books that are designed to root out the collaboration & coruption between the government & the health care industry &, jail those that influence the cost of business & medicine. &, if a foreign market creates a drug that works, is safe, & affordable, allow us to purchase it without any crap.
all the above being said, i realize there are those that have no health care at all &, they are the ones that should be enrolled in health care systems that are designed to fit their health care needs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)