hello america!!! in this 'election year', i hear what's not said by obama, &, i hear what's said by the 'black leaders' of today &, they just don't mesh...
yes, you can call me anything that you wish to however, you, your momma &, grand momma will never be able to call me wrong---i am 'knowitall'...
well, no sense joking with you:::let's just jump off the cliff & let me worry about the parachute later................
obama doesn't use the word 'black' in his speeches so, i guess it doesn't exist. he 'expects' blacks to be loyal to him even though they are catching hell in these dire times. he 'talks' up to 'white america' & down to 'black america'....please, check this out cause i don't know nothing-& yes, you can watch the whole thing: 27:31 or you skip ahead to the 26:26 mark & see how he talks to black folks..........
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=swlaZJ2RbBw
unfortunately, they applaud him. why? he's telling them to shut the hell up, stop complaining, take off your bedroom slippers &, put on your marching shoes &, march with him---right over that economic cliff: he 'expects' blacks to march with him. why? simply because of your color?
black america, you all know in your hearts, this man does not care about your plight!!!! you know!!!! why the CBC applauded him is beyond me---they're supposed to be our 'leaders' & yet, they got caught up in the moment & applauded this man who has no thoughts of even trying to suggest how they 'raise' the poverty level so many blacks are in/have been in/ &, will stay in.
well, 'knowitall', what's so wrong about a black man being president? my answer is: it's obama. he doesn't care about the blacks of america or blacks elsewhere---he only cares about their vote.
yeah, here you go. i'm wrong as usual. good! glad you feel that way!!! now, when you stop calling me all those nasty names, you can tell me exactly what he's done for the black community's across america....&, i'm willing to bet that i can make my dinner from scratch, eat it, burp & fart &, take a nap, long before you can come up with answer that doesn't have 'food stamps' or 'extended unemployment' in it..............................i'm waiting!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
the majority of those 'jobs', because of his 'stimulus', went to 'middle-class-white-america'...google it yourselves.......so what; you were a black teacher that got rehired because of his 'stimulus' but you're unemployed now or, will soon be.........................COME ON BLACK AMERICA, ANSWER MY QUESTION!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hey, call me crazy but, when was the last time you saw obama campaigning in the black community? (damn, i didn't mean to cause you a stroke---just asking easy questions here)
to be honest, obama doesn't use the "BLACK" word or visit those black community's that really 'NEED' his help...it's a fact.............you know it, i know it & all americans know it....he's more focused on 'middle-class' america (which the majority of black america is not) & latino's....................................................please, prove me wrong........................................
now, tell me he could talk to 'white america' like he talked to our 'so-called leaders' & get the same applause he received from the CBC? & no, i don't want to hear that crap about he could have gotten it on a monday but not on a thursday...........for that matter; even on the oprah show, he would not have talked to blacks the same way..................................................................................................................
instead of 'white america' trying to figure this out, let me ask my 'so-called black leaders' this: yes, obama is black----no argument here----however, what has obama done that will help our black people rise out of poverty? &, do you, as 'the so-called black voice' know exactly what his plans are to eliminate the drugs, crimes, & violence that have permeated our neighborhoods for far to long? &, while you're at it, exactly what are his plans for putting 'black america' back to work??????? now,come on. you clapped for this man so surely, you must know something the rest of us don't....give it up & don't be 'BS-ING' me. you got sucked in, just like the rest of america & your pride won't allow you to admit it..........although, i'm sure each & every one of you that clapped, are wishing you could take that clap back.
the absolute truth is this: obama cares more & will try to do more for 'middle-class america' & 'latino america' then he will ever do or attempt to do for 'black america'. &, before you get your hopes up, he will be reaching out to the 'asian community' next.......................
now, prove me wrong by leaving a comment, even if you don't want me to know where it came from.
Tuesday, June 26, 2012
OBAMA, PLEASE KEEP RACE OUT OF IT!!!
hello america!!! i can only guess that congress went after roger clemens because he played with black baseball players...a lie is a lie no matter the color of the liar. i heard it with my own ears & saw it with my own eyes...if you're not sure of when you first learned about something, say you're not sure. don't give a date & when that date is proven false, change your story. ag, william holder, has allowed this to be a bigger issue then it should be. hey, if there's nothing there, submit the requested documents redacted & go on about your business........
now, let's get back to that 'voter suppression' crap...i ask if nancy pelosi or those 'so-called' black leaders that are supporting holder, have valid id cards, valid driver's licenses or, 'up-to-date' voting cards? were they all able to open their bank accounts without valid id? are they able to file their taxes without a valid social security number? can they all register their cars without a valid drivers license? can they get car insurance without it? & nancy, when you're in washington, can i just stop by & get in to see you if i can't prove who i am?
it really pisses me off that we are not just one nation. i live in allentown pa & my grandson attends william allen. i had to exchange my id card for a pass at the security booth just to get in the school to go to the office & sign my grandson out for an emergency. i then had to show my id card to the receptionist at the st luke's emergency room & she made a copy of it. TRUE STORY!!! another true story is, i needed to 'prove' who i was when i first received my library card..........
this november, those who want to vote in allentown pa will need valid id. i see nothing wrong or racial with this. i honestly believe that everybody within our borders should be able to prove who they are. now these people can use the 'race' argument anyway they wish however, i'm betting the farm that, if i ask the black caucus to help me obtain a loan (for whatever reason), they're going to know who i am before the conversation even gets that far.
i was born in the era of adam clayton powell & i grew up in a melting pot in yonkers & bklyn ny...so, i do know a little sumtin-sumtin...i commend the naacp for all that they have achieved over the years but, if a large group of unknown blacks & latino's were to start badgering the board for a new leader, i'll bet they'll be asked to prove who they are...
on the other hand, if the repubs were somehow able to get enough undocumented residents to vote against nancy pelosi, do you think she would be happy with the results if she was voted out of office? she's a good sport so, she'd probably just accept it & walk away....YEAH, RIGHT!!!!!!
if getting to the 'gov't centers & the costs of getting valid id are actually hardships, there are numerous agency's out there only too willing to help...however, the argument that requiring these people to get valid id or valid voter cards is weak. it's weak because you expect these same people to get to the polls to cast their vote for whom you favor & that is not a hardship. what you're saying is: it's okay to forget the hardship for the people to get there & cast their vote but, it's not okay for them to have to travel that same distance to obtain valid id, etc...........
i guess it's okay for any black or latino to come along & marry your daughter or son & never have to prove who they are!!! yeah, right. & when you do that background check on them & find out who they say they are doesn't exist, you'll just let it go at that.
look, we have become a nation of 'find out who you're doing business with before you do it'. if nancy pelosi were moving all of her home furnishings to ny & i came along to do the moving, would you have my back if she asked me for my id & proof of insurance & i couldn't produce either? could we call her a racist? would i make the front page or foxnews?
call me whatever but, new yorkers know that when they get in a taxi, that pictured id of the driver is where they can see it &, if they look at that picture & it's a very light skinned face & yet the driver is jet black, are you going to be comfortable? what do you do when the id isn't there?
i cannot understand why some policy's apply to one group of blacks or latino's & not the others. perhaps if an arizonian black or latino doesn't have to provide proof of who they are, that same policy should have to apply to the ny black & latino cops & bank cashiers that applied for those jobs..let's just go id-less......
instead of calling in the 'race card', wouldn't we better be serving our underprivileged people by assisting them in their efforts to 'prove' who they are? hell, look at obamas immigration plan---they even have to 'prove' certain things before they benefit from obamas executive privilege......
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/06/15/s1-exercising-prosecutorial-discretion-individuals-who-came-to-us-as-children.pdf
the criteria as outlined in the above homeland security article has me wondering::::how do they 'prove' they meet the standards? how does one enter our schools & armed forces without documentation? i'm a 10 year vet & i know what i had to have to get in. do you mean to tell me that i can move to alabama & just enroll my grandson in school without providing valid id? how does one prove they have 'resided' here (illegally) for 5 continuous years or entered our country before their 16th birthday? how do they 'prove' they are not older then 30? as for the criminal record part, only time will tell because there are numerous cases of people giving false names to the police & it's not caught until later...i know because i managed a temp agency for 1 1/2 years.....
well, i did not mean to write all this but since i'm here: i honestly feel that the 'criteria' set for the 'undocumented' is far worse then requiring them to obtain a valid id card or properly register to vote.
now, if i offended anybody, it is what it is. it wasn't intended. that said, when & if these 'children' step forward to take advantage of this new program, what happens to the parents of these kids if they are found: to have committed a serious crime? had been deported (or ordered deported) & have returned to our shores? or, are a threat to our security? DO WE BREAK UP THE FAMILY BY DEPORTING THEM? JUST WHAT DOES HAPPEN TO THEM?
bottom line: i am strongly in favor of voting rights for everybody that qualifies. i am also strongly in favor of whoever resides within our borders be able to prove who she or he is at all times.
in closing, i applaud those that stand up for the rights of those that can't however, i suggest that caution be used. william holder is responsible for this mess &, if he, as the head legal brain in the country doesn't know how to answer questions from a house of reps' questions, he should be on his own...i would rather the NAACP get involved in the following & find the truth about the claims it makes.....
http://hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/29-black-people-have-been-killed-by-policesecurity-since-jan-2012-16-since-trayvon/
again, i thank the NAACP for trying to fight for the rights of those that can't...by the way, where's our ag, william holder on the above article????
now, let's get back to that 'voter suppression' crap...i ask if nancy pelosi or those 'so-called' black leaders that are supporting holder, have valid id cards, valid driver's licenses or, 'up-to-date' voting cards? were they all able to open their bank accounts without valid id? are they able to file their taxes without a valid social security number? can they all register their cars without a valid drivers license? can they get car insurance without it? & nancy, when you're in washington, can i just stop by & get in to see you if i can't prove who i am?
it really pisses me off that we are not just one nation. i live in allentown pa & my grandson attends william allen. i had to exchange my id card for a pass at the security booth just to get in the school to go to the office & sign my grandson out for an emergency. i then had to show my id card to the receptionist at the st luke's emergency room & she made a copy of it. TRUE STORY!!! another true story is, i needed to 'prove' who i was when i first received my library card..........
this november, those who want to vote in allentown pa will need valid id. i see nothing wrong or racial with this. i honestly believe that everybody within our borders should be able to prove who they are. now these people can use the 'race' argument anyway they wish however, i'm betting the farm that, if i ask the black caucus to help me obtain a loan (for whatever reason), they're going to know who i am before the conversation even gets that far.
i was born in the era of adam clayton powell & i grew up in a melting pot in yonkers & bklyn ny...so, i do know a little sumtin-sumtin...i commend the naacp for all that they have achieved over the years but, if a large group of unknown blacks & latino's were to start badgering the board for a new leader, i'll bet they'll be asked to prove who they are...
on the other hand, if the repubs were somehow able to get enough undocumented residents to vote against nancy pelosi, do you think she would be happy with the results if she was voted out of office? she's a good sport so, she'd probably just accept it & walk away....YEAH, RIGHT!!!!!!
if getting to the 'gov't centers & the costs of getting valid id are actually hardships, there are numerous agency's out there only too willing to help...however, the argument that requiring these people to get valid id or valid voter cards is weak. it's weak because you expect these same people to get to the polls to cast their vote for whom you favor & that is not a hardship. what you're saying is: it's okay to forget the hardship for the people to get there & cast their vote but, it's not okay for them to have to travel that same distance to obtain valid id, etc...........
i guess it's okay for any black or latino to come along & marry your daughter or son & never have to prove who they are!!! yeah, right. & when you do that background check on them & find out who they say they are doesn't exist, you'll just let it go at that.
look, we have become a nation of 'find out who you're doing business with before you do it'. if nancy pelosi were moving all of her home furnishings to ny & i came along to do the moving, would you have my back if she asked me for my id & proof of insurance & i couldn't produce either? could we call her a racist? would i make the front page or foxnews?
call me whatever but, new yorkers know that when they get in a taxi, that pictured id of the driver is where they can see it &, if they look at that picture & it's a very light skinned face & yet the driver is jet black, are you going to be comfortable? what do you do when the id isn't there?
i cannot understand why some policy's apply to one group of blacks or latino's & not the others. perhaps if an arizonian black or latino doesn't have to provide proof of who they are, that same policy should have to apply to the ny black & latino cops & bank cashiers that applied for those jobs..let's just go id-less......
instead of calling in the 'race card', wouldn't we better be serving our underprivileged people by assisting them in their efforts to 'prove' who they are? hell, look at obamas immigration plan---they even have to 'prove' certain things before they benefit from obamas executive privilege......
http://i2.cdn.turner.com/cnn/2012/images/06/15/s1-exercising-prosecutorial-discretion-individuals-who-came-to-us-as-children.pdf
the criteria as outlined in the above homeland security article has me wondering::::how do they 'prove' they meet the standards? how does one enter our schools & armed forces without documentation? i'm a 10 year vet & i know what i had to have to get in. do you mean to tell me that i can move to alabama & just enroll my grandson in school without providing valid id? how does one prove they have 'resided' here (illegally) for 5 continuous years or entered our country before their 16th birthday? how do they 'prove' they are not older then 30? as for the criminal record part, only time will tell because there are numerous cases of people giving false names to the police & it's not caught until later...i know because i managed a temp agency for 1 1/2 years.....
well, i did not mean to write all this but since i'm here: i honestly feel that the 'criteria' set for the 'undocumented' is far worse then requiring them to obtain a valid id card or properly register to vote.
now, if i offended anybody, it is what it is. it wasn't intended. that said, when & if these 'children' step forward to take advantage of this new program, what happens to the parents of these kids if they are found: to have committed a serious crime? had been deported (or ordered deported) & have returned to our shores? or, are a threat to our security? DO WE BREAK UP THE FAMILY BY DEPORTING THEM? JUST WHAT DOES HAPPEN TO THEM?
bottom line: i am strongly in favor of voting rights for everybody that qualifies. i am also strongly in favor of whoever resides within our borders be able to prove who she or he is at all times.
in closing, i applaud those that stand up for the rights of those that can't however, i suggest that caution be used. william holder is responsible for this mess &, if he, as the head legal brain in the country doesn't know how to answer questions from a house of reps' questions, he should be on his own...i would rather the NAACP get involved in the following & find the truth about the claims it makes.....
http://hiphopandpolitics.wordpress.com/2012/04/06/29-black-people-have-been-killed-by-policesecurity-since-jan-2012-16-since-trayvon/
again, i thank the NAACP for trying to fight for the rights of those that can't...by the way, where's our ag, william holder on the above article????
OBAMA, WHAT ABOUT ALL THOSE HOUSE PASSED BILLS STUCK AT THE SENATE???
hello america!!! i have to ask why our 'so-called leader', obama, fails to ask the dem controlled senate why these house passed jobs related bills just sit there &, at the same time, blames pres bush & the sitting repubs for our jobs problems??? after all, senate majority leader, harry reid is his boy or he's harry's boy but, in either event, he should feel comfortable calling reid & say, 'harry, why don't you guys do something so we don't look so bad'....how hard could that be? here are the bills.............
http://runyan.house.gov/legislative-work/jobs-plan/republican-jobs-bills-passed-house-representatives
i can understand one party smearing the other, especially during an election year however, i can't accept that the above bills are held hostage to strengthen obamas claim of a 'do nothing congress' &, what's more exasperating is: the media is saying nothing. they attend the press conferences & never ask why these bills just sit there. why not? it's like they are in 'lock-step' with obama.
now i'm sure that every house passed bill sitting there isn't going to help us immediately however, the senate should bring them to the floor for debate & do what's necessary to get them to obama. then he can decide if he's going to sign them or not. at least one of those bills has to benefit us.
on the other hand, perhaps it's only repubs losing their jobs & obama thinks they'll get pissed off & vote for him & the dems this nov...yeah, that's it. employers are asking which party you support & if it's repub, they pink-slip you. sorry good people; got caught up in that 'stinkin thinkin' again...of course no dems are in those job fair or food stamp lines. i just don't know what made me think otherwise.......
i've told you from the beginning that obama is not to be trusted. for him to admit those house passed bills are just sitting at the senate collecting dust, makes 'the party of no' a dem thing. that being the case, i now ask: is obama an american first & dem second or, is he a dem first & the hell with the others?
http://runyan.house.gov/legislative-work/jobs-plan/republican-jobs-bills-passed-house-representatives
i can understand one party smearing the other, especially during an election year however, i can't accept that the above bills are held hostage to strengthen obamas claim of a 'do nothing congress' &, what's more exasperating is: the media is saying nothing. they attend the press conferences & never ask why these bills just sit there. why not? it's like they are in 'lock-step' with obama.
now i'm sure that every house passed bill sitting there isn't going to help us immediately however, the senate should bring them to the floor for debate & do what's necessary to get them to obama. then he can decide if he's going to sign them or not. at least one of those bills has to benefit us.
on the other hand, perhaps it's only repubs losing their jobs & obama thinks they'll get pissed off & vote for him & the dems this nov...yeah, that's it. employers are asking which party you support & if it's repub, they pink-slip you. sorry good people; got caught up in that 'stinkin thinkin' again...of course no dems are in those job fair or food stamp lines. i just don't know what made me think otherwise.......
i've told you from the beginning that obama is not to be trusted. for him to admit those house passed bills are just sitting at the senate collecting dust, makes 'the party of no' a dem thing. that being the case, i now ask: is obama an american first & dem second or, is he a dem first & the hell with the others?
OBAMA, LET'S JUST UNIONIZE THE WHOLE COUNTRY!!!
hello america!!! before obama was sworn in, i am on record as being against the unions that have been plaguing our gov't & private systems for what seems like forever. their greed (not every one of them) for wanting more while doing less has been a well known established fact. because of their numbers, importance & community dependence on them, they have always been in a position to dictate the terms of their own contracts....those 'more pay-less hours', 'more healthcare benefits-for less money', 'more perks' &, 'excellent pension packages' have been causing the deaths of many, many private sector company's for years &, it's finally caught up to our gov't at all levels.........
now, i last wrote about this early this morning at 12:46am & i wake up to find this, which was written at 5:40am...........
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/26/news/economy/public-pension-finances/index.htm?iid=HP_LN
i don't have the resources nor do i have the ability to even make the charts that some of the articles i post make. that said, it doesn't take a harvard grad to see that the gov't, at all levels, have to solve their own problems in responsible ways...they have to quit spending what they don't have; they have to get rid of the programs that are not absolutely necessary; they have to rework the union contracts &, if that fails, file for bankruptcy & start all over. it may seem harsh but hey, it's got to be done.......
obama is always talking about 'fair' but, he refuses to touch on the unfairness of union contracts. what's fair about public sector workers paying much less for their own healthcare coverage & receiving far better benefits then their private sector counterparts...are you going to make the argument that a unionized garbage collector is worth more then a non-unionized one? can you honestly tell me a unionized janitor is worth more then his private sector counterpart?????? is a non-unionized nurse that saved a life worth less then a unionized one doing the same thing?????????
let's get real people!!!!! unions were formed because they make money. yes, collectively they can demand more however, we have long passed the point where we ask: are unions still worth it? they are given these very lucrative contracts & they epitomize "the gift that keeps on coming".
please, don't get me wrong....those public sector workers are essential but, at what cost? &, who should bear that cost? in the face of today's economic reality, should those in the private sector have to continue to pay for the 'benefits & perks' for those working in the public sector? why can't the union workers pay their own 'fair share' for their own healthcare coverage & pensions?
times have changed & what recently occurred in wisconsin is but the tip of the iceberg. it had to happen & it won't stop now. in fact, dem controlled illinios is trying to imitate wisconsin (but shush. obama & the dems don't want you to know they are trying to copy a repub program because when the repubs do it, it's wrong).
now to show you why i have nothing against obamas policy's for america, check this out...his plan for fixing our economy is more teachers, more firemen, more policemen, more infrastructure jobs, more green job investments &, more job training programs..........i am positive that you're ecstatic that 4 more years of the 'same' will solve all of our problems?
man, stupid me! here i was with that 'stinkin thinkin' that gov't (at all levels) would first find a way to get out of the hole & wait; here comes obama with more dynamite, bulldozers, & hi-tech excavating equipment.
but, what do i know??? maybe i have it backwards like, maybe i can't see the trees because of the forest...because obviously, a 35 year old female non-unionized ambulance driver is worth far less then a 35 year old female unionized ambulance driver!!!!!!!!!! yeah, i must have gotten it 'sdarwkcab'...silly me!!!!
now, i last wrote about this early this morning at 12:46am & i wake up to find this, which was written at 5:40am...........
http://money.cnn.com/2012/06/26/news/economy/public-pension-finances/index.htm?iid=HP_LN
i don't have the resources nor do i have the ability to even make the charts that some of the articles i post make. that said, it doesn't take a harvard grad to see that the gov't, at all levels, have to solve their own problems in responsible ways...they have to quit spending what they don't have; they have to get rid of the programs that are not absolutely necessary; they have to rework the union contracts &, if that fails, file for bankruptcy & start all over. it may seem harsh but hey, it's got to be done.......
obama is always talking about 'fair' but, he refuses to touch on the unfairness of union contracts. what's fair about public sector workers paying much less for their own healthcare coverage & receiving far better benefits then their private sector counterparts...are you going to make the argument that a unionized garbage collector is worth more then a non-unionized one? can you honestly tell me a unionized janitor is worth more then his private sector counterpart?????? is a non-unionized nurse that saved a life worth less then a unionized one doing the same thing?????????
let's get real people!!!!! unions were formed because they make money. yes, collectively they can demand more however, we have long passed the point where we ask: are unions still worth it? they are given these very lucrative contracts & they epitomize "the gift that keeps on coming".
please, don't get me wrong....those public sector workers are essential but, at what cost? &, who should bear that cost? in the face of today's economic reality, should those in the private sector have to continue to pay for the 'benefits & perks' for those working in the public sector? why can't the union workers pay their own 'fair share' for their own healthcare coverage & pensions?
times have changed & what recently occurred in wisconsin is but the tip of the iceberg. it had to happen & it won't stop now. in fact, dem controlled illinios is trying to imitate wisconsin (but shush. obama & the dems don't want you to know they are trying to copy a repub program because when the repubs do it, it's wrong).
now to show you why i have nothing against obamas policy's for america, check this out...his plan for fixing our economy is more teachers, more firemen, more policemen, more infrastructure jobs, more green job investments &, more job training programs..........i am positive that you're ecstatic that 4 more years of the 'same' will solve all of our problems?
man, stupid me! here i was with that 'stinkin thinkin' that gov't (at all levels) would first find a way to get out of the hole & wait; here comes obama with more dynamite, bulldozers, & hi-tech excavating equipment.
but, what do i know??? maybe i have it backwards like, maybe i can't see the trees because of the forest...because obviously, a 35 year old female non-unionized ambulance driver is worth far less then a 35 year old female unionized ambulance driver!!!!!!!!!! yeah, i must have gotten it 'sdarwkcab'...silly me!!!!
OBAMA, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!!!
hello america!!! here's your daily jobs situation...http://www.dailyjobcuts.com/ while sat & sun were quiet, monday was business as usual, more layoffs & closings...so much for obamas stimulus...i hope all those millions of unemployed or underemployed americans can see that his stimulus has failed america beyond a doubt.
our gov't on the state & city level are all having a hard time surviving...& all of them have one thing in common---pension funding. all of those lucrative pension plans are coming back to bite us big time &, the problem is, it didn't just pop up & start happening. well, it can only get worse before it gets better.
at a time when the union contracts are actually hurting gov't, obama wants to add even more public union workers to the rolls. yep, that's the answer...damn, i must be dumb because i just didn't see it before.......the answer was right there in my face....while my state & city are struggling to pay out what they are already under contract for, just hire more teachers, firemen &, police, sign them to a union contract & hell, we'll be doing just 'fine'. ain't no sense going a little broke, let's just go all the way. obama got it right! have the states get more public sector people hired under those luscious union contracts, cut all the services except schools, fires, & policing, say the hell with the private sector & those people that can't keep there homes & we can all live happily ever after, paying those salary's with food stamps because we won't have jobs....what a moron!!!
it didn't work the first time & nothing has changed to allow it to work in the future. good people, if your 'so-called' leader can't learn from his past mistakes &, offers you more of the same for another four years, it shouldn't take much for which way your vote should go, unless you're one of those public sector people that may be re-employed....
we don't need more gov't. actually, we need less gov't & we need less gov't spending...above all else, we need a responsible fed gov't & that starts with a responsible person at the top...obama is just not that person...he's like: mom, i got a headache from running into the brick wall. why? i wanted to get to the other side. go around it or climb over it. okay mom. (the next day) mom, i got a headache from running into the brick wall. why? i wanted to get to the other side...(mom should have put him out of his misery right there & saved us all) obama doesn't learn from his mistakes & he doesn't know how to publicly admit his failures & he damn sure won't apologize.
our gov't on the state & city level are all having a hard time surviving...& all of them have one thing in common---pension funding. all of those lucrative pension plans are coming back to bite us big time &, the problem is, it didn't just pop up & start happening. well, it can only get worse before it gets better.
at a time when the union contracts are actually hurting gov't, obama wants to add even more public union workers to the rolls. yep, that's the answer...damn, i must be dumb because i just didn't see it before.......the answer was right there in my face....while my state & city are struggling to pay out what they are already under contract for, just hire more teachers, firemen &, police, sign them to a union contract & hell, we'll be doing just 'fine'. ain't no sense going a little broke, let's just go all the way. obama got it right! have the states get more public sector people hired under those luscious union contracts, cut all the services except schools, fires, & policing, say the hell with the private sector & those people that can't keep there homes & we can all live happily ever after, paying those salary's with food stamps because we won't have jobs....what a moron!!!
it didn't work the first time & nothing has changed to allow it to work in the future. good people, if your 'so-called' leader can't learn from his past mistakes &, offers you more of the same for another four years, it shouldn't take much for which way your vote should go, unless you're one of those public sector people that may be re-employed....
we don't need more gov't. actually, we need less gov't & we need less gov't spending...above all else, we need a responsible fed gov't & that starts with a responsible person at the top...obama is just not that person...he's like: mom, i got a headache from running into the brick wall. why? i wanted to get to the other side. go around it or climb over it. okay mom. (the next day) mom, i got a headache from running into the brick wall. why? i wanted to get to the other side...(mom should have put him out of his misery right there & saved us all) obama doesn't learn from his mistakes & he doesn't know how to publicly admit his failures & he damn sure won't apologize.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)