hello america!!! isn't this the very same 'keystone pipeline' that obama said he was going to do all he could do to put approval on the fast-track???http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/29/obama-comments-on-keystone-sparks-ire-more-concerns-about-projects-future/
i told you in the beginning, obama does not care about jobs growth &, to date, all of his actions are proving that statement to be 100% correct.
Monday, July 29, 2013
THE TRAIN WRECK IS HERE!!!
hello america!!! the following is the absolute truth regarding obamacare & employment &, the repubs could not find a better example...http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/29/workers-at-obamacare-call-center-angry-after-being-offered-jobs-without-health/
this is not what the people expected & hey, please take a look at how 'affordable' healthcare coverage is for those that are part-time...http://www.contracostatimes.com/rss/ci_23733819
you were told in the early days, when obama & company were first talking obamacare, that it would hurt employment. need you look any further to find our it has, it is &, it will continue to do so.
the only good thing about obamacare was the 'pre-existing conditions' mandate &, even that has run into problems. obama has suspended accepting new applicants suffering from pre-existing conditions until further notice...http://tavernkeepers.com/obamacare-suspended-pre-existing-condition-coverage/ &, please don't forget the way 'snuck' that $63 fee per person on everybody with coverage to help pay for the pre-existing conditions part.
ever since obamacare was signed into law, obama has had more then enough time to see that it would be fully operational come jan 1 2014 however, he just 'suspended' the emplorer mandate for one year while leaving 'intact' the individual mandate-------in other words, he going to give 'big business's' a break & force the middle-class to obtain their own coverage. so much for 'fairness!!!!!!!
like nancy pelosi said, 'we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it' &, other then her, obama & harry reid, nobody seems to like it. obama has even said, 'once you get obamacare you'll like it' however, spending millions of our dollars on getting the word out is not likable....
this is not what the people expected & hey, please take a look at how 'affordable' healthcare coverage is for those that are part-time...http://www.contracostatimes.com/rss/ci_23733819
you were told in the early days, when obama & company were first talking obamacare, that it would hurt employment. need you look any further to find our it has, it is &, it will continue to do so.
the only good thing about obamacare was the 'pre-existing conditions' mandate &, even that has run into problems. obama has suspended accepting new applicants suffering from pre-existing conditions until further notice...http://tavernkeepers.com/obamacare-suspended-pre-existing-condition-coverage/ &, please don't forget the way 'snuck' that $63 fee per person on everybody with coverage to help pay for the pre-existing conditions part.
ever since obamacare was signed into law, obama has had more then enough time to see that it would be fully operational come jan 1 2014 however, he just 'suspended' the emplorer mandate for one year while leaving 'intact' the individual mandate-------in other words, he going to give 'big business's' a break & force the middle-class to obtain their own coverage. so much for 'fairness!!!!!!!
like nancy pelosi said, 'we have to pass the bill to find out what's in it' &, other then her, obama & harry reid, nobody seems to like it. obama has even said, 'once you get obamacare you'll like it' however, spending millions of our dollars on getting the word out is not likable....
Sunday, July 28, 2013
MEDIA, DO YOUR JOBS!!!
hello america!!! the pro-obama media blindly support obama & that's a fact. truth be told, if it were not for them, obama would have never won either election. so, it's no wonder that they continue to support him by 'ignoring' or 'down-playing' anything negative about him. this comes as no surprise to me---actually, i expected it...http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/27/are-media-buying-into-phony-scandal-claim/
anybody that actually believes that the 'scandals' rocking the obama admin are 'phony' & are just 'distractions' are idiots. PERIOD...
i defy the media to answers these five (there could be many more) questions as honestly as they can::::::
1. if border agent (brian terry) were your son, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
2. if your son was one of the four americans that were killed in benghazi or, one of those that had been wounded, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
3. if that had of been your own reporter (&/or news agency) that had had their phone & email records searched, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
4. if that had of been your own organization that had been unfairly targeted by the irs, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
5. how can you stay silent about the nsa going through your phone & email records?
we all know what your honest answer would be...look, quit 'slanting' the news & report it as honestly as you can. all of the five mentioned events began under obamas 'so-called' leadership & yes, he screwed it up. in a nutshell, obama is ultimately responsible for the actions of all of those below him & no side-stepping can get around that fact.
the scandals are not 'phony' nor are they 'distractions' &, above all else, they are not republican made. they should be investigated & reported honestly & openly...
anybody that actually believes that the 'scandals' rocking the obama admin are 'phony' & are just 'distractions' are idiots. PERIOD...
i defy the media to answers these five (there could be many more) questions as honestly as they can::::::
1. if border agent (brian terry) were your son, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
2. if your son was one of the four americans that were killed in benghazi or, one of those that had been wounded, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
3. if that had of been your own reporter (&/or news agency) that had had their phone & email records searched, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
4. if that had of been your own organization that had been unfairly targeted by the irs, would you be satisfied with the answers you haven't gotten?
5. how can you stay silent about the nsa going through your phone & email records?
we all know what your honest answer would be...look, quit 'slanting' the news & report it as honestly as you can. all of the five mentioned events began under obamas 'so-called' leadership & yes, he screwed it up. in a nutshell, obama is ultimately responsible for the actions of all of those below him & no side-stepping can get around that fact.
the scandals are not 'phony' nor are they 'distractions' &, above all else, they are not republican made. they should be investigated & reported honestly & openly...
Saturday, July 27, 2013
OBAMA, JUST PARDON EVERYBODY & BE DONE WITH IT!!!
hello america!!! nothing is sacred to obama except his own wants. the following has to border on insanity...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/27/states-attorneys-now-opposing-feds-opposition-to-criminal-background-checks-for/
if obama has his way, daycare centers will unknowingly hire convicted child molesters; banks would unknowingly hire convicted armed robbers, etc. however, anybody applying for a secret service job will undergo a rigorous background check.
i guess if you a have a 3-time convicted dui person applying for a driving job, you won't have the option to find out about it.
just because a man attended harvard & columbia doesn't mean he can't be an idiot...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/07/27/states-attorneys-now-opposing-feds-opposition-to-criminal-background-checks-for/
if obama has his way, daycare centers will unknowingly hire convicted child molesters; banks would unknowingly hire convicted armed robbers, etc. however, anybody applying for a secret service job will undergo a rigorous background check.
i guess if you a have a 3-time convicted dui person applying for a driving job, you won't have the option to find out about it.
just because a man attended harvard & columbia doesn't mean he can't be an idiot...
WHAT IS OBAMAS MID EAST POLICY???
hello america!!! it's amazing what the computer shows...i've been watching (real-time) what's been going on in syria with a syrian & he's been kind enough to translate for me. he's shown me the devastation & killings that have become a part of syrian's every day life. it seems it's the rebels that are causing all the hell--at least from my friends point of view--& that assad is good for the country while we say he must go. &, you have this...http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20130727-700951.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
all i know is: the mid east is very unstable---contrary to what obama & company would have you believe---&, there doesn't seem to be any stability coming in the near future.
when all of the people took to the streets before the 'arab spring', obama was all over it. now that it's ended, nothing has been settled except to show that his mid east policy should be rethought.
this comes from cbs & you should actually take the time to use the arrow to see what's happened since the arab spring...http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57595817/massive-jailbreak-near-benghazi-libya-lets-more-than-1000-inmates-free/
all i know is: the mid east is very unstable---contrary to what obama & company would have you believe---&, there doesn't seem to be any stability coming in the near future.
when all of the people took to the streets before the 'arab spring', obama was all over it. now that it's ended, nothing has been settled except to show that his mid east policy should be rethought.
this comes from cbs & you should actually take the time to use the arrow to see what's happened since the arab spring...http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-202_162-57595817/massive-jailbreak-near-benghazi-libya-lets-more-than-1000-inmates-free/
OBAMA, EXACTLY WHICH SCANDAL IS PHONY???
hello america!!! let's look at those 'phony scandals'...
A)---gunwalking
the fed gov't (atf & the justice depart) allowed guns to be sold so they could track them to the mexican cartels but, somewhere along the line, they lost them & one of them was used to kill border agent (brian terry) while others have now been linked to other killings. both gov't agency's stonewalled the congressional investigations (&, still are) &, our ag (eric holder) was found to be in contempt of congress. the agency heads tried to blame 'much lower level' personnel which has been proved wrong. at first, nobody at the top knew anything & this has been proved wrong. the investigations are still ongoing because we still don't have the answers we so desperately need---such as:::how many guns are still outstanding? how do we prevent this from ever happening again? who was ultimately responsible & why won't that person (s) be fully punished? if there was no wrong-doing, why did holder need obama to apply executive privilege? why is the justice depart still withholding requested documents? who knew what & when did they know it? who is ultimately in control of the atf & justice depart?
B)---benghazi
obama, the state depart, the cia &, the military allowed our consulate to be attacked & overcome which directly led to the deaths of four americans & the wounding of others. the biggest problem is, they all used 'talking points' which blamed a video for the violence & yet, the attack was seen in real-time in washington dc by members of our state depart & others. there were 230 violent events (within a one year span) in libya leading up to the benghazi attack that our gov't ignored; our security was (at best) extremely weak &, the budget was not the reason; requests for additional security were denied; their safe-house was also attacked. why were the talking points changed &, who's responsible for that? why are so many different versions being uncovered at the congressional hearings? why weren't attempts made to rescue our people? what can we do to prevent this from ever happening again? why are the department heads still stonewalling the investigation? 10 months later & we still have a lot of unanswered questions. who knew what & when did they know it? who is ultimately in charge of the state department, cia &, military?
i must say that obama did say 'these acts of terror will not go unpunished' however, he did not label the benghazi attack an act of terror perse....
C)---james rosen & foxnews
at first, our ag (eric holder) didn't know anything about foxnews reporter (james rosen) having his phone & email records searched & yet, he's the one that signed off for the warrant. he lied to congress while under oath & seemingly, he lied to the judge that issued the warrant. &, as usual, he's still stonewalling congress. how come holder only went after foxnews? who is ultimately in charge of our justice department?
D)---nsa spying
at first, the heads of several departments denied that our phone & email records were being spied on however, the truth has started to imerge. under oath, department heads lied to congress---there's a pattern here---& they should be held accountable. the investigation is still ongoing. what's to stop this from ever happening again? who is ultimately in charge of the nsa & fbi?
E)---secret service
this agency had a problem from the very beginning of obamas first term. if you care to remember, they allowed uninvited guests to attend obamas parties & rub elbows with him & his wife. they are also guilty of prostitution problems as well as raucous behavior. when their problems were first leaked, they were denied. who is ultimately in charge of the secret service?
F)---homeland security
sexual inappropriate comments, lewd behavior &, bribery have rocked this agency. of course, nobody knew anything in the beginning & yet, it's all been proved true. who is ultimately in charge of homeland security?
G)---irs
first, nobody at the irs selectively targeted certain groups or people; than second, it was blamed on three low-level employees that implemented the targeting program; than third, it has reached all the way to an obama political appointee in washington dc that just happened to be visiting obama just days before the targeting began. conflicting testimony has been given at the congressional hearings one person has pleaded the fifth. fitting the pattern is the lack of knowledge the various agency heads & managers have about what's going on? the investigation is still ongoing & the stonewalling continues...who knew what & when? who gave the final approval for the targeting to take place? why was it just conservative groups &/or people targeted? how do we prevent this from ever happening again? who is ultimately in charge of the irs?
THE ONE COMMON FACTOR WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE IS: OBAMA & COMPANY DENIED INVOLVEMENT, WRONG-DOING & KNOWLEDGE RIGHT FROM THE VERY BEGINNING......HYMM!!!!!!!!!!
H)---law
out of all of the above, this one & benghazi bothers me the most. how can obama choose which part of a law he wants to follow or not? as much as i'm anti-obamacare, it is the law &, for obama to delay the implementation of a part of it (especially at this time) makes me wonder. business's have been telling the whole country how obamacare will cause them not to expand or hire people from day one &, he didn't listen to them then so, why now? if he were a man of his own rhetoric, he would have delayed the individual mandate & implemented the employer mandate---after all, that would better serve the middle-class. if obama had a problem with the law he's spent so much time on getting through congress & the supreme court, he didn't have to sign it into law. he's been telling us how much we needed it & had to have it & now, he's delaying a part of it. by what authority does he have to do this? i guess his oath means nothing!!! our executive branch of gov't is supposed to enforce the laws--PERIOD!!! hell, if the truth be told, every day, obama is acting more & more like the very tyrants he wants to overthrow in the mid east & africa. the problem here is: obama & company say they have no control over the irs (only to distance themselves from the irs scandal) & yet, when it suits their purposes, they can dictate to them, which laws they can delay.......
HYMM??? if obama has the power to delay any part of obamacare, he also has the power to tell them to delay collecting taxes on americans making $30,000 per year or less. (EXCUSE ME, I DIDN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!!!!!) obamacare (as much as i don't like it) was legally passed by both the house of reps & the senate & signed into law by obama & withstood the scrutiny of the supreme court---how can he legally delay any part of it? obamas actions are trampling on the constitution of the united states---his authority is not to make law or to decide if the law is lawful---his authority is to enforce it regardless of whether it's good or bad for our country. so yes, i have a very big problem with obamas actions & the inaction's of all members of congress to take him to court over this issue...i don't care whether or not you like obamacare, to give the employers a one year break from the employer mandate (&, i'm certain they have a hell of a lot more money then the middleclass) &, not give the middleclass that same break (&, i'm just as certain they have a whole lot less money then the employers) is not fair. & yet, obamas always preaching about looking out for the middleclass---when he has to back up his rhetoric, why do his actions always fall so short of the mark? well, if the constitution & ours law do not apply to obama, all american people of color should be more then upset. after all, doesn't he have the power to delay (for one year) the arrests of people of color for same color crimes?
obama said all of the above are 'phony scandals'...perhaps somebody within his admin should provide him with a dictionary & point out the definition of the word 'phony'. the above scandals have teeth & obama acknowledged they exist & vowed to get to the bottom of them...so much for his words.
obama is the 'phony' one for calling the above distractions & phony scandals---it's all happening under his watch & he should be held accountable. obama & company took their eye off the ball during the first 2 years of obamas first election & have never looked back. however, obama now says it's time to refocus...on what? the economy he doesn't know how to help? infrastructure---didn't work than/won't work now; green jobs investments/didn't work than/won't work now. hey, i have an idea...why not have the dem controlled senate revisit those 30 plus house-passed jobs related bill just sitting there (i'm sorry, obama doesn't want you to know that)? why not review exactly which regulations are hurting job growth? why not review exactly which taxes are hurting job growth? why not review exactly how obamacare is hurting job growth?
obama has surrounded himself with some of the 'smartest people on the planet' (his words) & this is as far as we've gotten. in truth, obama doesn't know what he's doing & those 'super-smart-idiots can't even control their own agency's &, he can't control them...............
hey, the repubs didn't start any of these scandals & that's a fact.
A)---gunwalking
the fed gov't (atf & the justice depart) allowed guns to be sold so they could track them to the mexican cartels but, somewhere along the line, they lost them & one of them was used to kill border agent (brian terry) while others have now been linked to other killings. both gov't agency's stonewalled the congressional investigations (&, still are) &, our ag (eric holder) was found to be in contempt of congress. the agency heads tried to blame 'much lower level' personnel which has been proved wrong. at first, nobody at the top knew anything & this has been proved wrong. the investigations are still ongoing because we still don't have the answers we so desperately need---such as:::how many guns are still outstanding? how do we prevent this from ever happening again? who was ultimately responsible & why won't that person (s) be fully punished? if there was no wrong-doing, why did holder need obama to apply executive privilege? why is the justice depart still withholding requested documents? who knew what & when did they know it? who is ultimately in control of the atf & justice depart?
B)---benghazi
obama, the state depart, the cia &, the military allowed our consulate to be attacked & overcome which directly led to the deaths of four americans & the wounding of others. the biggest problem is, they all used 'talking points' which blamed a video for the violence & yet, the attack was seen in real-time in washington dc by members of our state depart & others. there were 230 violent events (within a one year span) in libya leading up to the benghazi attack that our gov't ignored; our security was (at best) extremely weak &, the budget was not the reason; requests for additional security were denied; their safe-house was also attacked. why were the talking points changed &, who's responsible for that? why are so many different versions being uncovered at the congressional hearings? why weren't attempts made to rescue our people? what can we do to prevent this from ever happening again? why are the department heads still stonewalling the investigation? 10 months later & we still have a lot of unanswered questions. who knew what & when did they know it? who is ultimately in charge of the state department, cia &, military?
i must say that obama did say 'these acts of terror will not go unpunished' however, he did not label the benghazi attack an act of terror perse....
C)---james rosen & foxnews
at first, our ag (eric holder) didn't know anything about foxnews reporter (james rosen) having his phone & email records searched & yet, he's the one that signed off for the warrant. he lied to congress while under oath & seemingly, he lied to the judge that issued the warrant. &, as usual, he's still stonewalling congress. how come holder only went after foxnews? who is ultimately in charge of our justice department?
D)---nsa spying
at first, the heads of several departments denied that our phone & email records were being spied on however, the truth has started to imerge. under oath, department heads lied to congress---there's a pattern here---& they should be held accountable. the investigation is still ongoing. what's to stop this from ever happening again? who is ultimately in charge of the nsa & fbi?
E)---secret service
this agency had a problem from the very beginning of obamas first term. if you care to remember, they allowed uninvited guests to attend obamas parties & rub elbows with him & his wife. they are also guilty of prostitution problems as well as raucous behavior. when their problems were first leaked, they were denied. who is ultimately in charge of the secret service?
F)---homeland security
sexual inappropriate comments, lewd behavior &, bribery have rocked this agency. of course, nobody knew anything in the beginning & yet, it's all been proved true. who is ultimately in charge of homeland security?
G)---irs
first, nobody at the irs selectively targeted certain groups or people; than second, it was blamed on three low-level employees that implemented the targeting program; than third, it has reached all the way to an obama political appointee in washington dc that just happened to be visiting obama just days before the targeting began. conflicting testimony has been given at the congressional hearings one person has pleaded the fifth. fitting the pattern is the lack of knowledge the various agency heads & managers have about what's going on? the investigation is still ongoing & the stonewalling continues...who knew what & when? who gave the final approval for the targeting to take place? why was it just conservative groups &/or people targeted? how do we prevent this from ever happening again? who is ultimately in charge of the irs?
THE ONE COMMON FACTOR WITH ALL OF THE ABOVE IS: OBAMA & COMPANY DENIED INVOLVEMENT, WRONG-DOING & KNOWLEDGE RIGHT FROM THE VERY BEGINNING......HYMM!!!!!!!!!!
H)---law
out of all of the above, this one & benghazi bothers me the most. how can obama choose which part of a law he wants to follow or not? as much as i'm anti-obamacare, it is the law &, for obama to delay the implementation of a part of it (especially at this time) makes me wonder. business's have been telling the whole country how obamacare will cause them not to expand or hire people from day one &, he didn't listen to them then so, why now? if he were a man of his own rhetoric, he would have delayed the individual mandate & implemented the employer mandate---after all, that would better serve the middle-class. if obama had a problem with the law he's spent so much time on getting through congress & the supreme court, he didn't have to sign it into law. he's been telling us how much we needed it & had to have it & now, he's delaying a part of it. by what authority does he have to do this? i guess his oath means nothing!!! our executive branch of gov't is supposed to enforce the laws--PERIOD!!! hell, if the truth be told, every day, obama is acting more & more like the very tyrants he wants to overthrow in the mid east & africa. the problem here is: obama & company say they have no control over the irs (only to distance themselves from the irs scandal) & yet, when it suits their purposes, they can dictate to them, which laws they can delay.......
HYMM??? if obama has the power to delay any part of obamacare, he also has the power to tell them to delay collecting taxes on americans making $30,000 per year or less. (EXCUSE ME, I DIDN'T HEAR YOU!!!!!!!!!) obamacare (as much as i don't like it) was legally passed by both the house of reps & the senate & signed into law by obama & withstood the scrutiny of the supreme court---how can he legally delay any part of it? obamas actions are trampling on the constitution of the united states---his authority is not to make law or to decide if the law is lawful---his authority is to enforce it regardless of whether it's good or bad for our country. so yes, i have a very big problem with obamas actions & the inaction's of all members of congress to take him to court over this issue...i don't care whether or not you like obamacare, to give the employers a one year break from the employer mandate (&, i'm certain they have a hell of a lot more money then the middleclass) &, not give the middleclass that same break (&, i'm just as certain they have a whole lot less money then the employers) is not fair. & yet, obamas always preaching about looking out for the middleclass---when he has to back up his rhetoric, why do his actions always fall so short of the mark? well, if the constitution & ours law do not apply to obama, all american people of color should be more then upset. after all, doesn't he have the power to delay (for one year) the arrests of people of color for same color crimes?
obama said all of the above are 'phony scandals'...perhaps somebody within his admin should provide him with a dictionary & point out the definition of the word 'phony'. the above scandals have teeth & obama acknowledged they exist & vowed to get to the bottom of them...so much for his words.
obama is the 'phony' one for calling the above distractions & phony scandals---it's all happening under his watch & he should be held accountable. obama & company took their eye off the ball during the first 2 years of obamas first election & have never looked back. however, obama now says it's time to refocus...on what? the economy he doesn't know how to help? infrastructure---didn't work than/won't work now; green jobs investments/didn't work than/won't work now. hey, i have an idea...why not have the dem controlled senate revisit those 30 plus house-passed jobs related bill just sitting there (i'm sorry, obama doesn't want you to know that)? why not review exactly which regulations are hurting job growth? why not review exactly which taxes are hurting job growth? why not review exactly how obamacare is hurting job growth?
obama has surrounded himself with some of the 'smartest people on the planet' (his words) & this is as far as we've gotten. in truth, obama doesn't know what he's doing & those 'super-smart-idiots can't even control their own agency's &, he can't control them...............
hey, the repubs didn't start any of these scandals & that's a fact.
Friday, July 26, 2013
LIE AFTER LIE AFTER LIE!!!
hello america!!! so much for that obama bs about us having al qaeda on the run. i know it sounds good to say it however, it just isn't true...http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/07/23/iraq-arm-al-qaida-says-it-was-responsible-for-prison-raids-outside-baghdad/
like everything else that comes out of obamas mouth, his crap about al qaeda is just another lie.......
like everything else that comes out of obamas mouth, his crap about al qaeda is just another lie.......
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)