hello america! it took the special mass election of scott brown to the senate to get obama & the dems to change their tune.
it's been a year since obama took office & he's just now getting serious about jobs & the economy? he told us in the beginning that his stimulus bill was to create jobs & later he added 'to save jobs'. remember all those 'shovel-ready' jobs his bill was supposed to provide? what happened to them? where are they? the numbers he put out were false & he knew & knows it.
obama has spent so much time on everything but job creation & the economy:::i.e. 'cap & trade'; 'card check'; 'cash 4 clunkers'; 'gitmo'; 'bank bailouts'; 'government expansion'; 'michelle obamas million dollars plus a year staff'; 'foxnews & shutting them down'; 'gm & chrysler bailouts'; 'control of banks, gm &, chrysler'; 'tv & radio shows proclaiming how good a job he's doing'; 'closed door deals'; 'telling us how the people he nominated for his admin were the only ones that could do the job & then breaking his own pledges in hiring them'; 'keeping his past hidden from us'; 'forcing ceo's to return bonus money while keeping the money they donated to his campaign'; look at the time & energy he's invested in his healthcare reform.
do i need to go on? america is continuing to lose jobs because obama failed to address the problem in a serious way. i guess he figures that as long as he can sit back & blame pres bush for all the problems he "inherited", he doesn't have to do anything.
sen scott brown has changed all that. obama & the dems now see that they are facing a lot of problems come this nov & are going to spin everything wrong they've done to their advantage.
for that matter, they are already back-tracking on healthcare. they have blamed the lack of support on the repubs---this is pure crap. they passed all those other bills without repub support &, what they want to keep you from seeing is that they had problems with it from within their own ranks. the dems had control of both chambers of congress & could have passed a healthcare bill without any repub support---i know it, they know it &, now you know it.
healthcare was obamas baby & all those that opposed it were 'un-american' or 'activists'...their words, not mine. now obama is ready to make concessions in the bill & pelosi doesn't have the votes (bear in mind that she heads the house that has enough control to pass the bill without any repub support) &, this comes from the iron lady who recently said that regardless of what happened in mass, healthcare was going forward.
Friday, January 22, 2010
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
THANK YOU MASSACHUSETTS
hello america! what's amasing about obama is that he is true to his color---YELLOW. he distances himself from negativity no matter who's at fault...
the whitehouse blames the loss of the dem seat in mass on mass ag martha coakley &, the dem machine---she blames everyone but herself---the dem party doesn't know who to blame. please bear in mind that the finger-pointing began long before the polls closed.
but, back to obama:::he knew this was a key election for his party & for his agendas. why was he not involved in it sooner? he had time for his vacation; he's had time to sit down with a cop he said acted stupidily; he's had time to respond to the "tea parties"; he's had time to hold closed door meetings forcing others to pass his healthcare reform. WHY DID HE NOT MAKE TIME FOR THIS SPECIAL ELECTION? how can he expect others to 'trust' his judgement when he only shows up the day before the election?
the loss of that dem seat to a repub (scott brown) is his fault although others share the blame. had obama been up there in early december, it would probably still be a dem seat. you'll never hear that from him---he does not apologize or havn't you noticed?
obama has surrounded himself with a bunch of smart idiots. how could he & they not see what was going on in mass? this guy didn't run around mass campaigning for better schools, more police, lower state taxes, etc...he campigned directly against obama:::obamas stimulus bill; obamas bank bailouts; obamas cash-4-clunkers; obamas bringing captured terrorists within our borders to be tried in our courts; obamas card-check; obamas cap & trade; &, obamas healthcare reform bill. just how stupid do you have to be to miss a guy saying he will be the 41st vote against healthcare?
obama must & should be kicking himself because he missed a golden opportunity. he now knows it. yesterdays election is why he has tried to force-feed us all of his crap---he now cannot only see the writing on the wall--he can actually read it. he already has dems saying to hold the voting until the mass senator is officially seated, which is not good news for the dems.
so, i say thank you scott brown for having the courage to run against the odds &, i say thank you to the state of mass for getting it right at the ballot box...
the whitehouse blames the loss of the dem seat in mass on mass ag martha coakley &, the dem machine---she blames everyone but herself---the dem party doesn't know who to blame. please bear in mind that the finger-pointing began long before the polls closed.
but, back to obama:::he knew this was a key election for his party & for his agendas. why was he not involved in it sooner? he had time for his vacation; he's had time to sit down with a cop he said acted stupidily; he's had time to respond to the "tea parties"; he's had time to hold closed door meetings forcing others to pass his healthcare reform. WHY DID HE NOT MAKE TIME FOR THIS SPECIAL ELECTION? how can he expect others to 'trust' his judgement when he only shows up the day before the election?
the loss of that dem seat to a repub (scott brown) is his fault although others share the blame. had obama been up there in early december, it would probably still be a dem seat. you'll never hear that from him---he does not apologize or havn't you noticed?
obama has surrounded himself with a bunch of smart idiots. how could he & they not see what was going on in mass? this guy didn't run around mass campaigning for better schools, more police, lower state taxes, etc...he campigned directly against obama:::obamas stimulus bill; obamas bank bailouts; obamas cash-4-clunkers; obamas bringing captured terrorists within our borders to be tried in our courts; obamas card-check; obamas cap & trade; &, obamas healthcare reform bill. just how stupid do you have to be to miss a guy saying he will be the 41st vote against healthcare?
obama must & should be kicking himself because he missed a golden opportunity. he now knows it. yesterdays election is why he has tried to force-feed us all of his crap---he now cannot only see the writing on the wall--he can actually read it. he already has dems saying to hold the voting until the mass senator is officially seated, which is not good news for the dems.
so, i say thank you scott brown for having the courage to run against the odds &, i say thank you to the state of mass for getting it right at the ballot box...
Saturday, January 9, 2010
OBAMAS 1st YEAR
hello america! 1 year in office---these are the topics &, when you look at them, i only ask that you judge each one fairly.
1. transparency
2. hiring lobbyists
3. open & honest administration
4. pork infested bills
5. getting rid of programs that don't work
6. improving programs that do work
7. keeping america safe
8. putting the healthcare debate on c-span
9. healthcare for ALL americans
10. changing how washington does business
11. blaming the repubs for their opposition to the healthcare bill
12. calling the "tea party" people un-american
13. closing 'gitmo'
14. trying enemy combatants on american soil
15. affording those same combatants american constitutional rights
16. bowing to foreign dignitaries
17. fear tactics
18. teleprompters
19. attempting to shut down foxnews & other opposition outlets
20. no clear-cut foreign policy
21. no clear-cut american policy
22. 'cash-for-clunkers'
23. bank bailouts
24. auto bailouts
25. executive privilege lifting the ban on federal money to be used overseas for abortion
education, etc.
26. months long delay in approving increase of troops for afghanistan
27. 10 days plus delay in responding to xmas-day attempted plane bombing
28. no clear-cut immigration policy
29. exposing cia tactics
30. fixing the american economy
31. creating jobs
32. 'greening' america
33. reaching across the isle
34. 'card check'
35. 'cap & trade'
36. unemployment
37. 'global warming'
38. raising the taxes of the middle class
39. not pursuing our own oil interests
40. inability to provide congress with your own bill
41. inability to correct your own security breaches
42. calling mass. police action stupid
43. calling chris brown a jackass
44. lack of support for 'charlie r' to step down
45. expanding federal government
46. increasing the national deficit
47. cancelled 'ask & answer' news conferences
48. falsified 'job created' records
49. asking americans to sacrifice while their government spends more
50. blaming pres bush for all of america's present problems
51. needing more time
52. exports & imports
53. closed door deals with the unions
54. iran deadline
55. housing foreclosures
56. bank loans
57. fairness for all americans
58. lack of support for mass. senate race
59. honesty with the american people
60. opening obamas past to america
i'm sure there are other topics i over-looked however, i'm sure you get the point. i will disect each topic at a later date (after the state of the union address) & post my own grades for obama...
1. transparency
2. hiring lobbyists
3. open & honest administration
4. pork infested bills
5. getting rid of programs that don't work
6. improving programs that do work
7. keeping america safe
8. putting the healthcare debate on c-span
9. healthcare for ALL americans
10. changing how washington does business
11. blaming the repubs for their opposition to the healthcare bill
12. calling the "tea party" people un-american
13. closing 'gitmo'
14. trying enemy combatants on american soil
15. affording those same combatants american constitutional rights
16. bowing to foreign dignitaries
17. fear tactics
18. teleprompters
19. attempting to shut down foxnews & other opposition outlets
20. no clear-cut foreign policy
21. no clear-cut american policy
22. 'cash-for-clunkers'
23. bank bailouts
24. auto bailouts
25. executive privilege lifting the ban on federal money to be used overseas for abortion
education, etc.
26. months long delay in approving increase of troops for afghanistan
27. 10 days plus delay in responding to xmas-day attempted plane bombing
28. no clear-cut immigration policy
29. exposing cia tactics
30. fixing the american economy
31. creating jobs
32. 'greening' america
33. reaching across the isle
34. 'card check'
35. 'cap & trade'
36. unemployment
37. 'global warming'
38. raising the taxes of the middle class
39. not pursuing our own oil interests
40. inability to provide congress with your own bill
41. inability to correct your own security breaches
42. calling mass. police action stupid
43. calling chris brown a jackass
44. lack of support for 'charlie r' to step down
45. expanding federal government
46. increasing the national deficit
47. cancelled 'ask & answer' news conferences
48. falsified 'job created' records
49. asking americans to sacrifice while their government spends more
50. blaming pres bush for all of america's present problems
51. needing more time
52. exports & imports
53. closed door deals with the unions
54. iran deadline
55. housing foreclosures
56. bank loans
57. fairness for all americans
58. lack of support for mass. senate race
59. honesty with the american people
60. opening obamas past to america
i'm sure there are other topics i over-looked however, i'm sure you get the point. i will disect each topic at a later date (after the state of the union address) & post my own grades for obama...
Friday, January 8, 2010
OBAMA/NATIONAL SECURITY--ANOTHER OXYMORAN
hello america! if you listened to obamas speech yesterday concerning our security, you probably ended up like me---CONFUSED. common sense says that if we are at 'war' with terrorists & capture them, we should treat them as enemy combatants...
obama & his administration downplay the 'war on terrorism' & would have you believe it's a 'war on radical extremists'. well, call it what you want---the point is, they still don't get it. there are groups of people out there that are hellbent on killing americans no matter where the killing takes place.
so you ask, what's the problem, knowitall? after all, obama said 'the buck stops here' & that he would take care of it. the problem is obama can't even fix his own security. there have been 3 different reports of 'strangers' breaching his personal security at the whitehouse & 'rubbing shoulders' with him. these incidents have been on foxnews with the video to back them up. if obama couldn't fix this problem after the first incident, how in the hell can you expect him to 'fix' the bigger problems?
yeah, i know. give him more time---it's only been a year since he took over from pres bush. well, for those of you that are still willing to give him more time let me ask you this: how much more time will he need to understand that his "words must mean more then just words"? ask those people on that flight on x-mas day that actually got involved in stopping that would be bomber from blowing up that plane how much more time he needs.
more time!!! he's had more then enough time. i told you in the beginning that he didn't have any military experience; he doesn't have a clear-cut foreign policy; he doesn't understand the difference between an enemy combatant & a common criminal; he's extremely weak as a 'leader' & would rather allow others to make the decisions & then he'll support them.
still don't believe me? look at him bowing to foreign leaders & then denying it. what pisses me off the most about that is, he doesn't have enough back-bone to make them bow to him. &, no matter how you spin it, obamas bowing is a sign of submissiveness &, judging from the videos of it, he does it without thought.
need more? in reality, obama has 4 secs of state---hilary clinton (over-all flunky), richard holbrooke (afghanistan & pakistan), dennis ross (iran), & george mitchell (middle east). how are you going to reach a clear-cut foreign policy with so many cooks with their hands in the pot? the sad part of this is, they all have to report to someone that accepts the 'best sounding' thing he hears---not necessarily the 'best solution'
obama is full of crap when he grants the same rights & protection to captured enemy combatants that we give to those arrested for unpaid parking tickets. what is he trying to prove to america when he allows these people to be tried at our expense in our federal courts? they don't belong within our borders. &, if that doesn't make you mad, give some thought to this---obama is allowing some captured enemy combatants to be tried in our federal courts &, at the same time, he is allowing some to be tried in military tribunals. &, you're crazy to think that ag eric holder made the decision to try them in new york without consulting obama.
there are several 'smart' reasons they should not be tried within our borders...
1. taxpayers have to bear the cost of the security
2. americans working within the courthouse area are going to be screened & inconvenienced
3. the majority of americans don't want these people on our soil ( so who's agenda is this?)
4. if obama can allow un-maned drones to bomb suspected al queda & taliban strongholds without first reading them their rights, why be concerned with their rights when they are actually captured committing an act against us?
obama dropped the ball on our national security---he can blame it on his security advisors all he wants but let's be honest about this: instead of him supporting the cia & others for gathering info from 'terrorists', he has exposed them for their 'misdeeds' to the point that they have to change their methods for getting that info or face charges...yeah, i really feel safer...the x-mas would be bomber was willing to talk & was talking & should have been sent to "GITMO" & water-boarded by the cia; not held in one of our jails to be tried as a common criminal, nor, allowed to lawyer up & stop talking.
obama blames pres bush for all that is wrong with america. when will he man-up? he once spoke about pres bush sitting in a classroom when the twin towers went down & his handling of hurricane katrina----it took 10 plus days for obama to hold a news conference (he was on vacation) to talk to the american people. & then, remember how long it took him to respond to a request for more troops in afghanistan. NATIONAL SECURITY---
i don't think obama could find the word 'security' in websters even if i opened it to the 'n's'.
so, you obama faithful, keep on giving him more time &, when it's one of your loved ones or friends that fall victim to obamas time, don't bitch-just send him a letter saying you understand that he needs more time.
&, one more thing...just to put it in perspective---pres bush responded to the advise he received & everyone got on his case about it. afterall, he was the boss. how is that different then what obamas going through? he 'trusted' his security advisors & they failed him:::ISN'T THAT OBAMAS FAULT???
obama & his administration downplay the 'war on terrorism' & would have you believe it's a 'war on radical extremists'. well, call it what you want---the point is, they still don't get it. there are groups of people out there that are hellbent on killing americans no matter where the killing takes place.
so you ask, what's the problem, knowitall? after all, obama said 'the buck stops here' & that he would take care of it. the problem is obama can't even fix his own security. there have been 3 different reports of 'strangers' breaching his personal security at the whitehouse & 'rubbing shoulders' with him. these incidents have been on foxnews with the video to back them up. if obama couldn't fix this problem after the first incident, how in the hell can you expect him to 'fix' the bigger problems?
yeah, i know. give him more time---it's only been a year since he took over from pres bush. well, for those of you that are still willing to give him more time let me ask you this: how much more time will he need to understand that his "words must mean more then just words"? ask those people on that flight on x-mas day that actually got involved in stopping that would be bomber from blowing up that plane how much more time he needs.
more time!!! he's had more then enough time. i told you in the beginning that he didn't have any military experience; he doesn't have a clear-cut foreign policy; he doesn't understand the difference between an enemy combatant & a common criminal; he's extremely weak as a 'leader' & would rather allow others to make the decisions & then he'll support them.
still don't believe me? look at him bowing to foreign leaders & then denying it. what pisses me off the most about that is, he doesn't have enough back-bone to make them bow to him. &, no matter how you spin it, obamas bowing is a sign of submissiveness &, judging from the videos of it, he does it without thought.
need more? in reality, obama has 4 secs of state---hilary clinton (over-all flunky), richard holbrooke (afghanistan & pakistan), dennis ross (iran), & george mitchell (middle east). how are you going to reach a clear-cut foreign policy with so many cooks with their hands in the pot? the sad part of this is, they all have to report to someone that accepts the 'best sounding' thing he hears---not necessarily the 'best solution'
obama is full of crap when he grants the same rights & protection to captured enemy combatants that we give to those arrested for unpaid parking tickets. what is he trying to prove to america when he allows these people to be tried at our expense in our federal courts? they don't belong within our borders. &, if that doesn't make you mad, give some thought to this---obama is allowing some captured enemy combatants to be tried in our federal courts &, at the same time, he is allowing some to be tried in military tribunals. &, you're crazy to think that ag eric holder made the decision to try them in new york without consulting obama.
there are several 'smart' reasons they should not be tried within our borders...
1. taxpayers have to bear the cost of the security
2. americans working within the courthouse area are going to be screened & inconvenienced
3. the majority of americans don't want these people on our soil ( so who's agenda is this?)
4. if obama can allow un-maned drones to bomb suspected al queda & taliban strongholds without first reading them their rights, why be concerned with their rights when they are actually captured committing an act against us?
obama dropped the ball on our national security---he can blame it on his security advisors all he wants but let's be honest about this: instead of him supporting the cia & others for gathering info from 'terrorists', he has exposed them for their 'misdeeds' to the point that they have to change their methods for getting that info or face charges...yeah, i really feel safer...the x-mas would be bomber was willing to talk & was talking & should have been sent to "GITMO" & water-boarded by the cia; not held in one of our jails to be tried as a common criminal, nor, allowed to lawyer up & stop talking.
obama blames pres bush for all that is wrong with america. when will he man-up? he once spoke about pres bush sitting in a classroom when the twin towers went down & his handling of hurricane katrina----it took 10 plus days for obama to hold a news conference (he was on vacation) to talk to the american people. & then, remember how long it took him to respond to a request for more troops in afghanistan. NATIONAL SECURITY---
i don't think obama could find the word 'security' in websters even if i opened it to the 'n's'.
so, you obama faithful, keep on giving him more time &, when it's one of your loved ones or friends that fall victim to obamas time, don't bitch-just send him a letter saying you understand that he needs more time.
&, one more thing...just to put it in perspective---pres bush responded to the advise he received & everyone got on his case about it. afterall, he was the boss. how is that different then what obamas going through? he 'trusted' his security advisors & they failed him:::ISN'T THAT OBAMAS FAULT???
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)