hello america! here is the number one reason that you should believe nancy pelosi is lying-------
obama will stop at nothing to throw pres bush & his admin under the bus &, now that he has a chance to do that, concerning pelosi & what she did or didn't know, he backs out of it by saying, let's move forward. he & his press sec didn't even bother to say there may have been miscommunication between the cia & pelosi. that speaks volumes. obama's not going backing up pelosi tells me he knows she knew about the methods used.
so, he says let's move forward...he's the one that started this by 'closing' gitmo & exposing the tactics used there & telling america that he would release more photos. he's recanted on releasing the photos; has back-tracked on closing gitmo; doesn't want an investigation into the torture tactics used but, has left it up to ag william holder to investigate, who takes his lead from obama...& now, he wants us to move forward...
that's bs. call me stupid or whatever but, if the cia is lying to congress & is allowed to get away with it then all the bailouts in the world won't & can't help us. on the other hand, if the cia can prove they didn't lie to congress, that will restore a lot of our faith in the fed gov. more importantly, it will expose those that hide behind their 'power'. so yes, an honest & open investigation is needed. obama owes that to the american people.
pelosi has changed her story several times &, the latest version is that the bush admin misled her. i don't know what rules/laws cover this but, i am strongly hoping that pres bush & vp cheney sue her for slander & then everything will have to come out.
i hope the media will not let this die. we need to know the truth:::&, we can't let obama now hide behind that 'national security' crap. we already know about the sleep deprivation, the loud music, waterboarding, etc, thanks to obama, now he wants to hide behind the security of our country.
america, i don't know about the truth setting you free (there are a lot of people in jail because they told the truth) but, the truth is right. send a letter, or call, or email your elected officials to get this investigation started.
&, if you think i'm wrong-so-be-it but, when was the last time obama didn't take a pot-shot at pres bush? &, you can best believe that when obama has the cross-hairs on pres bush, he is quick to pull the trigger. why is he stone-walling now? when in doubt, let the truth come out.
Saturday, May 16, 2009
Wednesday, May 6, 2009
SPECTER, HOW DOES IT FEEL?
hello america! it is with great pleasure that i am able to say that sen arlen-sellout-specter finally
got what he deserved. 29 years in the business & he's just now learning that the democrats promise you one thing & give you another.
my fellow country people, this is politics at its best. apparently obama & sen harry-we-don't-need-stronger-regulatory-measures-reid had promised specter that he would be able to retain his seniority once he switched sides. &, as soon as he did, they stripped him-making him a junior senator. they even took his chairmanship from his---he lost a lot of power with his stupid switch, & now, he's at the mercy of the democrats, & this is why. the dems turned on him just like he turned his back on the repubs.
the dems have told him that he can regain his seniority---if he wins the 2010 election---the dem caucus can vote it to him. however, there are some issues that will be decided before then & his vote will be needed for the dems to push their crap down our throats. if he doesn't vote their way, he doesn't get his status back &, if he does vote their way between now & then, they won't need him after 2010. either way, i think he's screwed & he deserves it.
i don't see him telling the republicans that he made a mistake & asking them to take him back---besides, we don't need him. also, the damage is already done & his chairmanship will go to somebody else regardless of what he does.
the sad part of all of this is, specter switched parties because he could not win the up-coming 2010 election as a republican. he did for personal reasons---pure greed because, as a junior democrat, his political life career is at close to the end.
america. what the dems are doing to specter is the same as what they are doing to our country. obama & the rest of the dems tell us one thing & then do another. they said they don't want to own banks & yet, they do. in fact, they gave them money under one plan & have now changed it
so that the banks can't return the money thus, obama retains control of them. the same thing with gm & chrysler.
this country is in bad shape when the president can force ceo's to step down, force a company to be bought out by a foreign company & won't let companies repay the money they owe.
got what he deserved. 29 years in the business & he's just now learning that the democrats promise you one thing & give you another.
my fellow country people, this is politics at its best. apparently obama & sen harry-we-don't-need-stronger-regulatory-measures-reid had promised specter that he would be able to retain his seniority once he switched sides. &, as soon as he did, they stripped him-making him a junior senator. they even took his chairmanship from his---he lost a lot of power with his stupid switch, & now, he's at the mercy of the democrats, & this is why. the dems turned on him just like he turned his back on the repubs.
the dems have told him that he can regain his seniority---if he wins the 2010 election---the dem caucus can vote it to him. however, there are some issues that will be decided before then & his vote will be needed for the dems to push their crap down our throats. if he doesn't vote their way, he doesn't get his status back &, if he does vote their way between now & then, they won't need him after 2010. either way, i think he's screwed & he deserves it.
i don't see him telling the republicans that he made a mistake & asking them to take him back---besides, we don't need him. also, the damage is already done & his chairmanship will go to somebody else regardless of what he does.
the sad part of all of this is, specter switched parties because he could not win the up-coming 2010 election as a republican. he did for personal reasons---pure greed because, as a junior democrat, his political life career is at close to the end.
america. what the dems are doing to specter is the same as what they are doing to our country. obama & the rest of the dems tell us one thing & then do another. they said they don't want to own banks & yet, they do. in fact, they gave them money under one plan & have now changed it
so that the banks can't return the money thus, obama retains control of them. the same thing with gm & chrysler.
this country is in bad shape when the president can force ceo's to step down, force a company to be bought out by a foreign company & won't let companies repay the money they owe.
Tuesday, May 5, 2009
REPUBLICANS, THE TABLE IS SET
hello america! the pro-obama media doesn't have a clue as to what obama is up to, but, i have seen the writing on the wall & am here to inform you of what's up...
you've heard that old adage about keeping your enemies close---obama has taken it to heart & is keeping his within arms reach. he's very slick &, i truely feel sorry for all those that have been duped into thinking he was giving 'jobs' to his adversaries because he was 'truely reaching out'.
take a look at those that ran against him in the 2008 presidential campaign & where they are now...then you will understand me when i say that obama has stacked the democratic deck for his run in 2012.
joe biden/vice president/if obama fails-biden fails/obama has biden by the short hairs & biden will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
hilary clinton/sec of state/if obama fails-clinton fails/obama has clinton by the short hairs & will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
bill richardson/obama nominee for commerce sec/richardson withdrew from nomination due to federal investigation into 'pay-for-play' scam/richardson cannot mount a serious challenge in 2012 because of this.
john edwards/withdrew from the presidential campaign because of sexual scandal with videographer.
dennis kucinich/a strong democrat/supports obamas bills & if obama falls, he falls/does not have strong enough personality to mount a serious threat against obama.
chris dodd/extremely strong democrat/fought pres bush on all levels regarding stronger financial market regulatory reforms/is finished as a politician in his home state.
so, as you can see, obama has no strong democratic contenders for 2012. they have either done themseleves in or he's hired them without them knowing what he was planning---very, very slick &, it proves, he's not to be trusted. &, if you push the arguement to me, i can pull up the statements where biden & clinton said he was not ready to lead america.
you've heard that old adage about keeping your enemies close---obama has taken it to heart & is keeping his within arms reach. he's very slick &, i truely feel sorry for all those that have been duped into thinking he was giving 'jobs' to his adversaries because he was 'truely reaching out'.
take a look at those that ran against him in the 2008 presidential campaign & where they are now...then you will understand me when i say that obama has stacked the democratic deck for his run in 2012.
joe biden/vice president/if obama fails-biden fails/obama has biden by the short hairs & biden will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
hilary clinton/sec of state/if obama fails-clinton fails/obama has clinton by the short hairs & will not be able to mount a strong enough run to challenge obama.
bill richardson/obama nominee for commerce sec/richardson withdrew from nomination due to federal investigation into 'pay-for-play' scam/richardson cannot mount a serious challenge in 2012 because of this.
john edwards/withdrew from the presidential campaign because of sexual scandal with videographer.
dennis kucinich/a strong democrat/supports obamas bills & if obama falls, he falls/does not have strong enough personality to mount a serious threat against obama.
chris dodd/extremely strong democrat/fought pres bush on all levels regarding stronger financial market regulatory reforms/is finished as a politician in his home state.
so, as you can see, obama has no strong democratic contenders for 2012. they have either done themseleves in or he's hired them without them knowing what he was planning---very, very slick &, it proves, he's not to be trusted. &, if you push the arguement to me, i can pull up the statements where biden & clinton said he was not ready to lead america.
Saturday, May 2, 2009
LET ME OPEN YOUR EYES
hello america! let me start by 'pissing' some of you off---america got fat (under pres bush & a republican controlled washington) much to easy &, much to fast. the few safeguards that were in place to prevent the present economic problems of today---EVEN WITH PRES BUSH & HIS ADMIN CALLING FOR TIGHTER REGULATORY MEASURES---were ignored by politicians for their own political & personal gain. the dems & the repubs both continued to turn a blind eye to stronger regulation of the housing & financial markets so as, to allow those markets to continue to fill their campaign war chests. &, because our government didn't want to do their job, companies 'cooked' the books & you now know the results of that.
before i continue, i challenge you to click on the following link &, after you read it, do your homework on it. then you will know the truth for what it is & not for what obama wants you to believe it is...http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081009-10.html
the above is all part of the record that obama does not want you to see or hear. this way he can continue to feed your 'dislike' of pres bush for his own political gains by continuing to tell you how he 'inherited' this economic mess from pres bush. &, by doing so, he keeps his own 'dirty little secrets' out of the spotlight. he is so quick to blame pres bush for all of our troubles & never gives him 'good' credit for anything. under the first 6 years of pres bush, america grew at an alarming rate---that's a fact the majority of americans can attest to.
for obama to blame pres bush for our present troubles is pure crap. obama was as much a part of citigroup & the others failing as was the rest of washington...actually, he was a major player in their failing. however, our 'main-stream' media doesn't play fair & will poison us to believe what they want us to believe. in lieu of what obama has been blaming pres bush for, is it too much to ask that the other side of the coin be revealed? how come msnbc, fox, cnn & others don't ask obama about the following...click on the link below & you'll know the truth...
http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-force-it-to-make-bad-loans/
some of you call me an obama hater---call me what you will. but, let me make this perfectly clear to you. i don't get paid for these blogs. i (at this time) don't even have adds on them. i do this to put the truth out there &, i receive no form other of compensation other then the personal satisfaction of educating the ignorant. &, judging from the support america gave & is giving
obama, there are plenty of you out there that are still very ignorant about him.
but, before you condemn me all to hell, ask yourself this: why is it that certain companies get 'tarp' funds & others don't? however, before you prove your ignorance, think about this: those companies that received the most---gave the most........fannie & freddie, citigroup, gm & chrysler, bank of america &, the list goes on...check it out on opensecrets.org for yourself. &, one more thing...obama talks about the greed on wall street & the ceo's bonuses but, have you ever heard him say one sentence (with or without the teleprompter) about returning any of the money he received from those companies that received 'tarp' funds? just give some thought to obama telling you that there is too much greed at the corporate level & that those companies receiving 'tarp' funds can't pay out the bonuses & yet, he can't, hasn't, & won't tell you he is returning the money they contributed to his campaign. yet, he is spending our money to keep them afloat?
i don't care how ignorant you were prior to reading this but, if you read it all the way through & went to the links provided, i applaud you, regardless of how you now think of obama, because you now know the truth, regardless of what you do with it. &, i don't know about the truth setting you free but, i do know the truth is right.
before i continue, i challenge you to click on the following link &, after you read it, do your homework on it. then you will know the truth for what it is & not for what obama wants you to believe it is...http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2008/10/20081009-10.html
the above is all part of the record that obama does not want you to see or hear. this way he can continue to feed your 'dislike' of pres bush for his own political gains by continuing to tell you how he 'inherited' this economic mess from pres bush. &, by doing so, he keeps his own 'dirty little secrets' out of the spotlight. he is so quick to blame pres bush for all of our troubles & never gives him 'good' credit for anything. under the first 6 years of pres bush, america grew at an alarming rate---that's a fact the majority of americans can attest to.
for obama to blame pres bush for our present troubles is pure crap. obama was as much a part of citigroup & the others failing as was the rest of washington...actually, he was a major player in their failing. however, our 'main-stream' media doesn't play fair & will poison us to believe what they want us to believe. in lieu of what obama has been blaming pres bush for, is it too much to ask that the other side of the coin be revealed? how come msnbc, fox, cnn & others don't ask obama about the following...click on the link below & you'll know the truth...
http://www.mediacircus.com/2008/10/obama-sued-citibank-under-cra-to-force-it-to-make-bad-loans/
some of you call me an obama hater---call me what you will. but, let me make this perfectly clear to you. i don't get paid for these blogs. i (at this time) don't even have adds on them. i do this to put the truth out there &, i receive no form other of compensation other then the personal satisfaction of educating the ignorant. &, judging from the support america gave & is giving
obama, there are plenty of you out there that are still very ignorant about him.
but, before you condemn me all to hell, ask yourself this: why is it that certain companies get 'tarp' funds & others don't? however, before you prove your ignorance, think about this: those companies that received the most---gave the most........fannie & freddie, citigroup, gm & chrysler, bank of america &, the list goes on...check it out on opensecrets.org for yourself. &, one more thing...obama talks about the greed on wall street & the ceo's bonuses but, have you ever heard him say one sentence (with or without the teleprompter) about returning any of the money he received from those companies that received 'tarp' funds? just give some thought to obama telling you that there is too much greed at the corporate level & that those companies receiving 'tarp' funds can't pay out the bonuses & yet, he can't, hasn't, & won't tell you he is returning the money they contributed to his campaign. yet, he is spending our money to keep them afloat?
i don't care how ignorant you were prior to reading this but, if you read it all the way through & went to the links provided, i applaud you, regardless of how you now think of obama, because you now know the truth, regardless of what you do with it. &, i don't know about the truth setting you free but, i do know the truth is right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)